A Systematic Review of Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Sexual Behavior: Disambiguation and Classification of Self-oriented Cognitive Schemata of Sexual Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/escpsi.16.2.2023.14849Keywords:
sexual behavior, sexual beliefs, sexual attitudes, systematic review, cognitive schema, attitudes towards sexual behaviorAbstract
Introduction. Sexual behavior attitudes is a mix of constructs still addressed with inconsistent classifications by actual research, showing diverse theoretical structures. For that reason, we aimed to review the literature in the search for common patterns to bring in an exhaustive disambiguated proposal. Methods. We carried out a systematic review of sexual attitudes questionnaires and reviews. After that, following thematic analysis principles, we reviewed and categorized codes. Results. Of the 1126 screened publications, 89 scales and 62 reviews were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 28 were eventually included (15 questionnaires and 13 reviews). We classified 144 pieces of valid information into 17 groups based on content. Discussion. We conclude our work as a classification of broadly referenced self-oriented cognitive schemata of sexual behavior (SO-CSSB) as a first stage in the process of developing common classifications to overcome the inconsistency in the evaluation of sexual attitudes.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Arcos-Romero, A. I., Calvillo, C., Granados, R., Álvarez-Muelas, A., & Sierra, J. C. (2020). The Spanish Version of the Sexual Opinion Survey (SOS-6): Evidence of Validity of a Short Version. International Journal of Psychological Research, 13(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4506
Barrada, J. R., Castro, Á., Correa, A. B., & Ruiz-Gómez, P. (2018). The tridimensional structure of sociosexuality: Spanish validation of the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. Journal of sex & Marital Therapy, 44(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1335665
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., & Chen, H. (2002). Moral hypocrisy: addressing some alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.330
Blanc, A., Byers, E. S., & Rojas, A. J. (2018). Evidence for the validity of the Attitudes Toward Sexual Behaviours Scale (ASBS) with Canadian young people. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2017-0024
Blanc, A., & Rojas, A. J., (2017). Instrumentos de Medida de Actitudes hacia la Sexualidad: Una Revisión Bibliográfica Sistemática. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación - e Avaliação Psicológica, 43(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.21865/ridep43_17
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brito-Rhor, M. D., Rodríguez-Herráez, B., & Trueba, A. (2020) Propiedades Psicométricas y la Validación del Instrumento de Evaluación del Autoesquema Sexual Femenino en Mujeres Jóvenes Ecuatorianas. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación. 50(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.21865/ridep54.1.07
Buhi, E. R., & Goodson, P. (2007). Predictors of adolescent sexual behavior and intention: A theory-guided systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.027
Calvillo, C., Sánchez-Fuentes, M. d. M., & Sierra, J. C. (2018). Revisión sistemática sobre la satisfacción sexual en parejas del mismo sexo. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 9(2), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2018.02.018
Carpenter, C. J. (2011). Meta-Analyses of Sex Differences in Responses to Sexual Versus Emotional Infidelity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414537
De Neef, N., Coppens, V., Huys, W., & Morrens, M. (2019). Bondage-discipline, dominance-submission and sadomasochism (BDSM) from an integrative biopsychosocial perspective: A systematic review. Sexual Medicine, 7(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2019.02.002
del Río, F. J., López, D. J., & Cabello, F. (2013). Adaptación del cuestionario Sexual Opinion Survey: Encuesta revisada de opinión sexual. Revista Internacional de Andrología, 11(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2012.09.003
Demarchi, S., Tomas, F., Franchi, A., & Fanton, L. (2020). Cognitive dissonance and false rape allegations: A case study. La Revue de Médecine Légale, 11(3), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medleg.2020.04.004
Derry, S. J. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychologist, 31(3-4), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653264
Evangeli, M., Baker, L. L., Pady, K., Jones, B., & Wroe, A. L. (2016). What leads some people to think they are HIV-positive before knowing their diagnosis? A systematic review of psychological and behavioural correlates of HIV-risk perception. AIDS Care, 28(8), 943-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1139040
Figueroa, O., Fernández, A. M., & Jara, C. (2018). ¿Por qué Somos Infieles? Aplicación Inicial de una Escala para Estimar las Razones por las que Hombres y Mujeres son Infieles. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación - e Avaliação Psicológica, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.21865/ridep48.3.02
Fino, E., Giuliani, M., Pierleoni, L., Gambino, G., Cosmi, V., & Simonelli, C. (2018). Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Homosexuality Scale of the Trueblood Sexual Attitudes Questionnaire. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(6), 784-796. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1364558
Gilboa, A., & Marlatte, H. (2017). Neurobiology of schemas and schema-mediated memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 618-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.013
Goodson, P., Buhi, E. R., & Dunsmore, S. C. (2006). Self-esteem and adolescent sexual behaviors, attitudes, and intentions: a systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(3), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.05.026
Heiman, J.R. (2002) Sexual dysfunction: Overview of prevalence, etiological factors, and treatments. The Journal of Sex Research, 39(1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552124
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Reich, D. A. (2006). The brief sexual attitudes scale. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552301
Horn, M., Piedmont, R., Fialkowski, G., Wicks, R., & Hunt, M. (2005). Sexuality and spirituality: The embodied spirituality scale. Theology & Sexuality, 12(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355835805057788
Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169
Kane, L., Dawson, S. J., Shaughnessy, K., Reissing, E. D., Ouimet, A. J., & Ashbaugh, A. R. (2019). A review of experimental research on anxiety and sexual arousal: Implications for the treatment of sexual dysfunction using cognitive behavioral therapy. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2043808719847371
Karaga, S., Davis, D. E., Choe, E., & Hook, J. N. (2016). Hypersexuality and religion/spirituality: A qualitative review. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 23(2-3), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2016.1144116
King, C., Llewellyn, C., Shahmanesh, M., Abraham, C., Bailey, J., Burns, F., ... & Mercer, C., Clark, L., Copas, A., Howarth, A., Hughes, G., Mercer, C., Miners, A., Pollard, A., Richardson, D., Rodger, A., Roy, A., & Gilson, R. (2019). Sexual risk reduction interventions for patients attending sexual health clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study. Health Technology Assessment, 23(12), 1-122. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta23120
Labrador, F. J. Crespo, M. 2001. Tratamientos psicológicos eficaces para las disfunciones sexuales. Psicothema, 13(3), 428-441.
Leiblum, S., Wiegel, M., & Brickle, F. (2003). Sexual attitudes of US and Canadian medical students: The role of ethnicity, gender, religion and acculturation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990310001609813
Lief, H. I., Fullard, W., & Devlin, S. J. (1990). A new measure of adolescent sexuality: SKAT-A. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 16(2), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614576.1990.11074980
Lipp, N., Dużmańska-Misiarczyk, N., Strojny, A., & Strojny, P. (2021). Evoking emotions in virtual reality: schema activation via a freeze-frame stimulus. Virtual Reality, 25(2), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00454-6
Magginetti, J., & Pillsworth, E. G. (2020). Women’s sexual strategies in pregnancy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.10.001
Mannberg, A. (2012). Risk and rationalization—The role of affect and cognitive dissonance for sexual risk taking. European Economic Review, 56(6), 1325-1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.06.005
Marston, C., & King, E. (2006). Factors that shape young people's sexual behaviour: a systematic review. The Lancet, 368(9547), 1581-1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69662-1
McKee, A., Litsou, K., Byron, P., & Ingham, R. (2021). The relationship between consumption of pornography and sexual pleasure: results of a mixed-method systematic review. Porn Studies, 8(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2021.1891564
Meskó, N., Szatmári, D., Láng, A., Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2022). Why Hungarians have sex (YSEX?-HSF). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02072-y
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
Muise, A., Maxwell, J. A., & Impett, E. A. (2018). What theories and methods from relationship research can contribute to sex research. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(4-5), 540-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1421608
Nobre, P., Pinto, J., & Allen, F. (2003). Sexual dysfunctional beliefs questionnaire: An instrument to assess sexual dysfunctional beliefs as vulnerability factors to sexual problems. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(2), 171-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468199031000061281
O’Donohue, W.T. & Geer, J.H. (1993). Handbook of the assessment and treatment of the sexual dysfunctions. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2011). Gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: A review of meta-analytic results and large datasets. Journal of Sex Research, 48(2-3), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.551851
Pinney, E. M., Gerrard, M., & Denny, N. W. (1987). The Pinney Sexual Satisfaction Inventory. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498709551359
Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., & Schützwohl, A. (2019). The cognitive‐evolutionary model of surprise: A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 50-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12292
Sánchez-Fuentes, M. del M., & Santos-Iglesias, P. (2016). Sexual satisfaction in Spanish heterosexual couples: testing the Interpersonal Exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 42(3), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1010675
Sánchez-Fuentes, M. del M., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2014). A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70038-9
Shaw, A. M., & Rogge, R. D. (2016). Evaluating and refining the construct of sexual quality with item response theory: development of the quality of Sex Inventory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(2), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0650-x
Sierra, J. C., Arcos-Romero, A. I., & Calvillo, C. (2020). Validity evidence and norms of the Spanish version of the Hurlbert Index of Sexual Fantasy. Psicothema, 32(3), 429-436. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.14
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Sexual dimensions of person description: Beyond or subsumed by the Big Five? Journal of Research in Personality, 34(2), 141-177. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2267
Sheeran, P., Maki, A., Montanaro, E., Avishai-Yitshak, A., Bryan, A., Klein, W. M. P., Miles, E., & Rothman, A. J. (2016). The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 35(11), 1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000387
Snell, W. E., Fisher, T. D., & Walters, A. S. (1993). The Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire: An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Annals of Sex Research, 6(1), 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00849744
Stulhofer, A., Busko, V., & Brouillard, P. (2010). Development and bicultural validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Sex Research, 47(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903100561
Tavares, I. M., Heiman, J. R., Rosen, N. O., & Nobre, P. J. (2021). Validation of the Maternal and Partner Sex During Pregnancy Scales (MSP/PSP) in Portugal: Assessing Dyadic Interdependence and Associations with Sexual Behaviors. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 18(4), 789–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.01.184
Velo-Higueras, C., Cuéllar-Flores, I., Sainz-Costa, T., Navarro-Gómez, M. L., García-Navarro, C., Fernández-McPhee, C., Ramírez, A., Bisbal, O., Blázquez-Gamero, D., Ramos-Amador, J.T., Valencia-Ortega, E. & González-Tomé, M. I. (2019). Jóvenes y VIH. Conocimiento y conductas de riesgo de un grupo residente en España. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica, 37(3), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2018.05.015
Weinberger, J. M., Houman, J., Caron, A. T., & Anger, J. (2019). Female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review of outcomes across various treatment modalities. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 7(2), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.12.004
Wesche, R., Claxton, S. E., & Waterman, E. A. (2021). Emotional outcomes of casual sexual relationships and experiences: A systematic review. Journal of Sex Research, 58(8), 1069–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1821163
Woertman, L., & van den Brink, F. (2012). Body image and female sexual functioning and behavior: a review. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2-3), 184–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.658586
Xu, Z. X., Ma, H. K., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2019). Maybe I am not as moral as I thought: calibrating moral identity after immoral action. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1347-1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9686-5
Yapp, E. J., & Quayle, E. (2018). A systematic review of the association between rape myth acceptance and male-on-female sexual violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.002
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Velo, Miguel A. Ruiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.