This have I learned from over 40 years of personality research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.vi6.13403Keywords:
Emoción, ansiedad, personalidad, sí mismoAbstract
During the over 40 years in which I have conducted personality research, I have had a number of insights about the research process that I thought would be worth sharing: an awareness of the human side of science; lessons from the person-situation debate; lessons from comparing research on highly egoinvolving natural events, such as sport parachuting, with laboratory analogues; the realization of what it is wrong with the concept of Freudian unconscious and what should be done to replace it; and awareness of pervasive biases in the journal-reviewing process. Perhaps the one more general lesson I have learned is that the advancement of psychology as a cumulative, integrative science is hampered not so much by its conceptual complexity as by the difficulty of humankind to view itself objectively, with honesty, courage, and a willingness to surrender illusions.
Downloads
Metrics
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
References
Alker, H. A. (1972). Is personality situationally specific or intrapsychically consistent? Journal of Personality, 40, 1-16.
Argyle, M., & Little, B. R. (1972). Do personality traits apply to social behavior? Journal of Theory of Social Behavior, 2, 1-35.
Bern, D. J. (1972). Constructing cross situational consistencies in behavior: Some thoughts on Alker’s critique of Mischel. Journal of Personality, 40, 17-26.
Bern, D. J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of’ the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81,506-520.
Block, J. (1968). Some reasons for the apparent inconsistency of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 210-212.
Bowners, K.S. (1973). Situationism in psycology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307-336.
Catlin, G., & Epstein, S. (1992). Unforgettable experiences. The relation of life-events to basic beliefs about self and world. Social Cognition, 10, 189-209.
Day, H. D., Marshall, D., Hamilton, B., & Christy, J. (1983). Some cautionary notes regarding the use of aggregated scores as a measure of behavioral stability, Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 97-109.
Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between experiential and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819-829.
Denes-Raj, V., Epstein, S., & Cole, J. (1995). The generality of the ratio-bias phenomenon. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 1083-1092.
Ekehammar, B. (1974). Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1026-1048.
Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 956-974.
Epstein, S. (1962). Theory and experiment on the measurement of drive and conflict. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 10, pp. 127-209). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited, or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404-416.
Epstein, S. (1976). Anxiety, arousal, and the self-concept. In 1. G. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 3, pp. 183-224). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Epstein, S. (1977). Traits are alive and well. En S. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 83-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Epstein, S. (1979a). The stability of behavior: 1. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097-1126.
Epstein, S. (1979b). Explorations in personality today and tomorrow. American Psychologist, 34, 649-65 3.
Epstein, S. (1980a). The self-concept: A review and the proposal of an integrated theory of personality. En E. Staub (Ed.), Personality: Basic issues and current research (pp. 82-132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Epstein, S. (1980b). The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 790-806.
Epstein, S. (1983a). A research paradigm for the study of personality and emotions. In M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 91-154). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Epstein, S. (1983b). Natural healing processes of the mind: H. Graded stress inoculation as an inherent coping mechanism. En D. Meichenbaum & M. Jaremko (Eds.), Stress prevention and management. A cognitive behavioral approach (pp. 39-66). New York: Plenum.
Epstein, S. (1983c). The unconscious, the preconscious, and the self-concept. En J. Suls & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 219-247). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Epstein, S. (1983d). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360-392.
Epstein, S. (1984). The stability of behavior across time and situations. En R. Zucker, J. Arnoff, & A. I. Rabin (Eds.), Personality and the prediction of behavior (pp. 209-268). San Diego: Academic Press.
Epstein, S. (1985). The implications of cognitive-experiential self-theory for research in social psychology and personality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 15,283-310.
Epstein, S. (1986). Does aggregation produce spuriously high estimates of behavior stability? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1199-12 10.
Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. En L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research: Theory and research (pp. 165-192). New York: Guilford.
Epstein, S. (1991a). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: Implications for developmental psychology. En M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Vol. 23. Self-processes and development (pp. 79-123). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Epstein, S. (1991b). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative theory of personality. En R. C. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology (pp. 111-137). New York: Guilford.
Epstein, S. (1991c). The self-concept, the traumatic neurosis, and the structure of personality. En D. Ozer, J. M. Healy, Jr., & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (Vol. 3, Part A, pp. 63-98). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Epstein, S. (1993a). Implications of cognitive-experiential self-theory for personality and developmental psychology. En D. Funder, R. Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasey, & K. Widaman (Eds.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (pp. 399-438). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Epstein, S. (1993b). Bereavement from the perspective of cognitive-experiential selftheory. En M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement. Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 112-125). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, S. (1994a). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
Epstein, S. (1994b). Trait theory as personality theory: Can a part be as great as the whole? Psychological Inquiry, 5, 120-122.
Epstein, S., & Burstein, K. (1966). A replication of H vland’s study of generalization to frequencies of tone. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 782-784.
Epstein, S., Denes-Raj, V, & Pacini, R. (in press). The Linda problem revisited from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Epstein, S., & Fenz, W. D. (1965). Steepness of approach and avoidance gradients in humans as a function of experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1-12.
Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C., & Huh, E. (1992). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: Evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 328-339.
Epstein S., & Morling, B. (1995). Is the self motivated to do more than enhance and verify itself? In M. H. Kemis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 9-29). New York: Plenum.
Epstein S., & O’Brien, E. J. (1985). The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 513-537.
Fenz, W. D., & Epstein, S. (1962). Measurement of approachavoidance conflict by a stimulus dimension in a test of thematic apperception. Journal of Personality, 30, 613-632.
Fenz, W. D., & Epstein, S. (1967). Gradients of physiological arousal of experienced and novice parachutists as a function of an approaching jump. Psychosomatic Medicine, 29, 33-5 1.
Fenz, W. D., & Epstein, S. (1968). Specific and general inhibitory reactions associated with the mastery of stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 52-56.
Golding, S. L. (1975). Flies in the ointment: Methodological problems in the analysis of the percentage of variance due to persons and situations. Psychological Bulletin, 82,278-288. 3
Hovland, C. L. (1937). The generalization of conditioned responses: I. The sensory generalization of conditioned responses with varying frequencies of tone. Journal of General Psychology, 17, 125-148.
Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
Mischel, W. (1983). Alternatives in the pursuit of predictability and consistency of persons: Stable data that yield unstable interpretations. Journal of Personality, 51, 578—604.
Mischel, W. (1984). Convergences and challenges in the search for consistency. American Psychologist, 39, 351-364.
Mischel, W. (1990). Personality dispositions revisited and revised: A view after three decades. En L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 11134). New York: Guilford.
Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1982). Beyond déjà vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89, 730-755.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). An appreciation of Donald T. Campbell. Psychological Science, 2,213-221.
Sarason, I. G., Smith, R. E., & Diener, E. (1975). Personality research: Components of variance attributable to the person and the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 199-204.
Sedikides, C. (1993). Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 317-338.
Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1995). The multiply motivated self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1330-1335.
Shweder, R.A. (1975). How relevant is an individual difference theory of personality? Journal of Personality, 43, 455-484.
Swann, W. B., Griffin, J. J., Predmore, S., & Gaines, B. (1987). The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 881-889.
Swann, W. B., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1989). Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 782-79 1.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3-20). New York: Cambridge University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
10.png)
ESCRITOS DE PSICOLOGÍA-PSYCHOLOGICAL WRITINGS is funded by the 