The self from the social identity theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.vi1.13399Keywords:
Social identity, intergroup behavior, group processes, deindividuation, social categorizationAbstract
The Social Identity perspective in Social Psychology tries to explain group phenomena (in-and out-group). Although originally, the theory of Social Identity by Tajfel (1984) studied the intergroup relationships, more recently, the Theory of Self-Categorization (Turner, 1999) analyzes group processes in either small or big groups. The Social Identity perspective has very important implications in the definition of the Social Psychology, since it provides significant means to comprehend group processes, collective behaviour, self-concept, and personality.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Anastasio, P., Bachman, B., Gaertner, S. y Dovidio, J. (1997). Categorization, recategorization and common group identity. En R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers y S. A. Haslam (Eds). The Social Psychology of Stereotyping and Group Life (pp. 236-256). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Asch, S. (1952). Social Psychology. Nueva Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Barreto, M. y Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of anonimity and group identification on progroup behavior in computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research, 33, 590-610.
Billig, M. (1976). Social psychology and intergroup relations. Londres: Academic Press.
Billig, M. y Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-52.
Brewer, M. B. y Schneider, S. K. (1990). Social identity and social dilemmas: A double-edged sword. En D. Abrams y M. A. Hogg (Eds). Social Identity Theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 169-184). Londres: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
Brown, R. J. (1995). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
David, B. y Turner, J. C. (1992). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion. Paper presented at the joint EAESP/SESP meeting, Leuven/Louvain-lave, 15-18 July, Bélgica.
David, B. y Turner, J.C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: is being a member of the out-group an adventage? Bristish Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-134.
Diener, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. En P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group Influence (pp. 2O9-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Doise, W. (1982). L ‘explication en Psychologie Sociale. París: Presses Universitaire de France.
Duck, J., Hogg, M. y Deborah, J. T. (2000). The perceived impact of persuasive messages on “us” and “them”. En D. J. Terry y M. A. Hogg (Eds). Attitudes, behaviour, and social context (pp. 265-293). Londres: Erlbaum. Canto, J. M. (1998). Psicología de los grupos. Málaga: Aljibe.
Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept: revisited or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404-416.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Festinger, L., Pepitone, A. y Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382-389.
Fielding, K. y Hogg, M. (1997). Social identity, selfcategorization and leadership: a field study of small interactive groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 39-51.
Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1-33.
Gergen, K. J. (1971). The concept of self. Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
González, M. P. (1995). Orientaciones teóricas fundamentales en psicología de los grupos. Barcelona: EUB.
Greenwald, A. G. (1981). Self and memory. En G. Bower (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15; pp. 201-236). Nueva York: Academic Press.
Greenwald, A. G. y Pratkanis, A. R. (1984). The self. En R. S. Wyer y T. K. Srull (Eds). Handbook of social cognition (Vol 3; pp. 129-178) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haslam, S. A. (1998). Your wish is my command: The role of social identity and self-categorization processes in translating a leader’s words into flowers actions. Comunicación presentada en Conference on the Social Psychology of Leadership. Melbourne: Australia.
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in Organization. Londres: Sage Publications.
Haslam, S. A. y Turner, J. C. (1998). Extremism and deviance: Beyond taxonomy and bias. Social Research, 65, 435-448.
Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C. y Reynolds, K. J. (1998). The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 203-239.
Hogg, M. A. (1992). The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity. Londres: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S. y Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 246-276.
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J. y White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quartely, 58, 255-269.
Israel, J. y Tajfel, H. (1972). The context of social psychology: a critical assessment. Londres: Academic Press. Kihlstrom, J. E. y Cantor, N. (1984). Mental representations of the self. En L. Berkowitz (Ed). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol.. 17) (pp. 230276). Nueva York: Academic Press.
Le Bon, G. (1895). Psychologie des foules. Félix Alcan: París.
Lea, M., Spears, R. y De Groot, D. (2001). Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonimity Effects on Social Identity Processes Within Groups. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 526-537.
Lee, E.J. (2004). Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer-mediated communication; experimental tests of the social identity model of deindividuation effects. Human Communication Research, 30, 234-259
Markus, H. R. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
Markus, H. R. y Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic selfconcept: A social psychological perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
Moral, F. (2001). Influencia social en comunicación mediada por ordenador. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Málaga.
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A. y Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and Social Reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., y Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125-144.
Onorato, R. y Turner, J. C. (1996). Fluidity in the selfconcept. A shift from personal to social identity. Comunicación presentada en el Symposium sobre “Self, self-stereotyping and identity, 2o Encuentro de la Society of Australasian Social Psychologists, Canberra: Australia.
Onorato, R. S. y Turner, J. C. (1997). Individual differences and social identity: a study of self-categorization processes in the Markus paradigm. Comunicación presentada en el 3o Encuentro de la Society of Australasian Social Psychologists, New South Wales: Australia.
Postmes, T. y Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and Antinormative Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
Postmes, T., Spears, R. y Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? SIDE-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. Communication Research, 6, 689-715.
Postmes, T., Spears, R. y Lea, M. (1999). Social identity, normative content, and “deindividuation” in computer-mediated groups. En N. Ellemers y R. Spears (Eds). Social identity: Context, commitment, context (pp. 164-183). Oxford: Blackwell.
Postmes,T., Spears,R. y Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 3, 341-371.
Postmes,T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K. y De Groot,D. (1998). Social influence in Computer-Mediated-Communication. The effects of anonimity on group behavior. Manuscrito presentado para su publicación.
Prentice-Dunn,S., y Rogers, R.W. (1989). Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior. En P.B. Paulus (Ed). The psychology of group influence (pp. 86109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reicher, S. D. (1984). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioural effects of de-individuation in conditions of high and low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 341-350.
Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. EnJ.C.Turner,M.A.Hogg,PJ.Oakes,S.D.Reicher. y M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Reicher, S., Spears, R. y Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena.. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-199.
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Nueva York: Harpe.
Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Spears, R., Doosje, B. y Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
Spears, R., Lea, M. y Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
Spears, R., Lea, M., Corneliussen, R.A., Postmes, T. y Haar, W.T. (2002) Computer-Mediated Communication as a Channel for Social Resistance. Small Group Research, 33, 525-555.
Tajfel, H. (1959). Quantitative judgment in social perception. British Journal of Psychology, 50, 16-29.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroups relations. Londres: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1984). Grupos humanos y categorías sociales. Barcelona. Herder.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P. y Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-177.
Tajfel, H. y Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin y S. Worchel (Eds). The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Tajfel, H. y Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 101-114.
Terry, J. y Hogg, M. (2001). Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership in social influence processes. En J. Forgas y K. Williams (Eds). Social Influence (pp. 253-270). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Turner, J. C. (1981). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. Cahiers de Psychologie, 1, 93-118. Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A selfcategorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social Influence. Buckingham. Open University Press.
Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. En N. Ellemers, R. Spears y B. Doosje (Eds.). Social Identity (pp. 6-35). Londres: Blackwell Publishers.
Turner, J. C. y Bourhis, R. Y. (1996). Social identity, interdependence and the social group. A reply to Rabbie et al. En W. P. Robinson (Ed.). Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp.25-63). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Turner, J. C. y Haslam, S. A. (2000). Social identity, organizations and leadership. En M. E. Turner. Group at Work. Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 25-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Turner, J. C. y Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237-252.
Turner, J. C. y Oakes, P. J. (1997). The socially structured mind. En C. McGarty y S. A. Haslam (Eds). The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp355-373). Oxford. Blackwell.
Turner, J. C. y Onorato, R. (1999). Social identity, personality and the self-concept: A self-categorization perspective. En T. R. Tyler, R. Kramer y O. P. John (Eds). The Psychology of the Social Self (pp. 11-46). Hillsdale; NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. En W. J. Arnold y Levine (Eds.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 237-307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.