Social comparison and self-evaluation from an evolutionary perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.vi7.13394Keywords:
Evolutionary psychology, Social comparison, Self-esteem, Self-evaluation, Resource-holding potential, Social attention-holding potentialAbstract
This paper analyzes the drive underlying the self-evaluation of opinions and capacities in an evolutionary framework. The social process that induces self-evaluation is social comparison. This paper proposes that the origin of social comparison and self evaluation comes from social competition through two self-concepts: the potential resource-holding and the social attention-holding power. The psychological equivalent of these two concepts is self-esteem. Self esteem evolved as a sociometer that makes Homo Sapiens gauge the degree of social belonging/social exclusion within reference groups. People are motivated to behave in ways that conserve self-esteem, because self-esteem maintenance behaviour usually reduces the possibility of being ignored, avoided or excluded by others. Self-evaluation is more sensitive to exclusion by people with a close relationship than to rejection by people from outside this close circle. This sensitivity is related to the level of closeness, performance and self-relevance. This self-evaluation maintenance model is a mechanism that solves an evolutionary pro blem which Homo Sapiens must have been faced with in some key moment of evolution.willingness to surrender illusions.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Barkow, J.H. (1980). Prestige and self-esteem: A biosocial interpretation. In: Omark, D.R., Strayer, D.R. and Freedman, J., Editors, 1980. Dominance relations: An ethological view of social conflict and social interaction, Garland STPM Press, New York.
Beach , S. R. H., y Tesser, A. (2000). Self evaluation maintenance and evolution: Some speculative notes. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology. The new science of the mind. Boston: Pearson.
Buss, D. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (1998). Evolutionary social psychology. En Gilbert, Daniel T. (Ed); Fiske, Susan T. (Ed);(1998). The handbook of social psychology. Boston, MA, USA: Mcgraw-Hill.
Buunk, B. y Brenninkmeyer, V. (2000). Social comparison processes among depressed individuals: Evidence for the evolutionary perspectiva on involuntary subordinate strategies? En L. Sloman y P. Gilbert. Subordination and defeat. Londres: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Buunk, B. y Gibbons, F. X. (2000). Toward an enlightenment in social comparison theory: Moving beyond classic and renaissance approaches. En J. Suls y L. Wheeler. Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Buunk, B. y Mussweiler, T. (2001). New directions in social comparison research. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 467-475.
Caporael, L. R. (1997). The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and psychology review, 1, 276-298.
Cosmides, L. y Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. En Barkow, Cosmides y Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Daly, M. y Wilson, M. (1994). Evolutionary psychology of male violence. En J. Archer (Ed.) Male violence. Londres: Routledge.
Daly, M., Salmon, C. y Wilson, M. (1997). Kinship: The conceptual hole in psychological studies of social cognition and close relationships. En Simpson, Jeffry A. (Ed); Kenrick, Douglas T. (Ed); et-al. (1997). Evolutionary social psychology. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Darwin, Ch. (1859/1988). El origen de las especies. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Darwin, Ch. (1872/1984). La expresión de las emociones en los animales y en el hombre. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1993). Biología del comportamiento humano. Madrid: Alianza.
Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Festinger, L., 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Fisher, J.D., Nadler, A. and Whitcher-Alagna, S., 1982. Recipient reactions to ais. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 27-54.
Forgas, J. P. y Williams, K. D. (2002). The social self. En J. Forgas y K. D. Williams. The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives. New York: Psychology Press.
Gilbert, P. (2001). Evolution and social anxiety. The psychiatric clinics of North America, 24, 723-751.
Gilbert, P. y Allan, S. (1994). Assertiveness, submissive behaviour and social comparison. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 295-306.
Gilbert, P., Price J. y Allan, S. (1995). Social comparison, social attractiveness and evolution: How might they be related? New Ideas in Psychology, 13, 149-165.
Gilbert, P. y Trower, P. (1990). The evolution and manifestation of social anxiety. In: Crozier, W.R.(Ed.) Shyness and embarrassment: Perspectives from social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harber, S., Barchas, P.R. y Barchas, J.D. (1981). A primate analogue of amphetamine induced behaviours in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 16, 181-196.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Humphrey, N. (1995). Una historia de la mente: La evolución y el nacimiento de la conciencia. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Hyman, H. (1942). The psychology of status. Archives of Psychology, 269, 94.
James, W. (1989). Principios de psicología. México: Fondo de cultura económica.
Kalma, A., 1991. Hierarchisization and dominance assessment at first glance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 165-181.
Kemper, T.D. (1990). Social structure and testosterone: explorations of the socio-bio-social chain. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P. y Butner, J. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110, 3-28.
Kenrick, D. T. y Trost, M. (2004). Evolutionary approaches to relationships. En H. T. Reis y C. E. Rusbult. Close relationships. New York: Psychological Press.
Kirpatrick, L. A. y Ellis, B.J. (2003). An evolutionarypsychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. En G. J. O. Fletcher y M. S. Clark (Eds.) Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal Processes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Krebs, J.R. y Davies, N.B. (1993). An introduction to behavioral ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Leary, M. R. (Ed.) (2001). Interpersonal rejection. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leary, M. R. (2002). The interpersonal basis of self-esteem: Death, devaluation, or deference? En J. Forgas y K. D. Williams. The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives. New York: Psychology Press.
Leary, M. R. y Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1-62). San Diego: Academic Press.
Leary, M. R. y Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. En M. H. Kernis (Ed.). Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem. New York: Plenum.
Maier, R. (2001). Comportamiento animal. Un enfoque evolutivo y ecológico. Madrid: McGraw Hill.
Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Parker, G.A. (1984). Evolutionary strategies. In: Krebs, J.R and Davies, N.B. (Eds.). Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pinker, S. (2000). Cómo funciona la mente. Barcelona: Destino.
Pinker, S. (2003). La tabla rasa. La negación moderna de la naturaleza humana. Barcelona: Paidós.
Rousseau, J.J. (1985). Del contrato social. Discurso sobre las ciencias y las artes. Discurso sobre el origen y los fundamentos de la desigualdad entre los hombres. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Sedikides, S. y Skowronski, J. (1997). The symbolic self in evolutionary context. Personality and social psychology review, 1, 80-102.
Simpson, J. A. E. y Kenrick, D. T. E. (1997). Evolutionary social psychology. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Suls, J. y Wheeler, L. (2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Suls, J. y Wills, T.A.(1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tesser, A. (1988). Toward self-evaluation maintenance of social behavior. En L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.21, pp. 181-227. New York: Academic Press.
Tesser, A. (1999). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. En R. F. Baumeister. The self in social psychology. New York: Psychology Press.
Tooby, J. y Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, Cosmides, and Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. California: Benjamin/Cummings.
Wenegrat, B. (1984). Sociobiology and mental disorder: A new view. California: Addison-Wesley.
Wilkinson, R. (2001). Las desigualdades perjudican. Jerarquías, salud y evolución humana. Barcelona: Crítica.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.