El efecto Mateo en niños con Dificultades Específicas de Aprendizaje de las Matemáticas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v3i1.13332Keywords:
Specific Learning Difficulties in Mathematics (LDM), Dyscalculia, Intelligence (CI), Matthew EffectAbstract
Previous research suggests that Learning Difficulties in Reading and Mathematics are highly related. This work tried to test in children if the presence of specific Learning Difficulties in Mathematics (LDM) was related to poor results in Intellectual Quotient (IQ) tests. Also, it is tested if differences in IQ are related to different mathematical performances. Therefore, the IQs of 12 LDM children enrolled in the first year of Primary School were compared with the IQs of 20 LDM children enrolled in the third year of Primary School. The IQs of LDM children were compared with the IQs of two non-LDM groups of the same cohorts. Among other results, it was observed that the IQs of the oldest LDM children were significantly lower than these of the youngest children, while no differences were found among non-LDM children. Furthermore, the presence of a high or low IQ did not always imply an equally high or low ma-thematical performance in the scholars.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Badian, N.A. (1983). Dyscalculia and nonverbal disorders of learning. En H.R. Myklebust (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (vol.5, pp. 235-263). Nueva York: Grune y Stratton.
Bermejo, V., Lago, Mª O. y Rodríguez, P. (1997). Dificultades de aprendizaje de las matemáticas. En J. N. García (Ed.), Instrucción, aprendizaje y dificultades (pp. 383-395). Barcelona: EUB.
Berninger, V.W. y Abbott, R.D. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude-achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. En G.R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 163-183). Baltimore, Maryland: Paulh Brookes Publishing.
Blanco, M. (1999). Desarrollo de un instrumento de evaluación, diagnóstico y orientación curricular del área de Matemáticas en los primeros años de escolaridad: Prueba evolutivo-curricular de matemáticas de Tordesillas (PRECUMAT). Premios nacionales a la innovación educativa 1999, documento no publicado.
Blanco, M. y Bermejo, V. (2004). Dificultades de aprendizaje en matemáticas. En V. Bermejo (Coord.), Cómo enseñar matemáticas para aprender mejor (pp. 215-238). Madrid: CCS.
Brody, L.E. y Mills, C.J. (1993). Gifted children with learning disabilities: a review of the Issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 283-296.
Bzufka, M.W.; Hein, J. y Neumaker, K.J. (2000). Neuropsichological differentiation of subnormal arithmetic abilities in children. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 65-76.
Carnine, D. (2003). IDEA: Focusing on Improving Results for Children with Disabilities. Commitee on Education and the Workforce. www.house.gov/search97cgi.
Dark, V.J. y Benbow, C.P. (1991). Differential enhancement of of working memory with mathematical versus verbal precocity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 48-60.
Fuchs, L.S. y Fuchs, D. (2002). Progress monitoring, accountability, and LD identification. Testimony to the Presidents Commission on Excellence in Special Education. Extraído del sitio Web: http://www.cecdr.org/content/index.cfm?contentID=28&Order=ASC
García, A. I. y Jiménez, J. E. (2002). Resolución de problemas verbales aritméticos en niños con dificultades de aprendizaje. Cognitiva. 12, 153-170.
Geary, D. C. (1994). Children’s Mathematical Development, Research and Practical Applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Geary, D. C. (2003). Learning disabilities in arithmetic: Problem-solving differences and cognitive deficits. En H.L. Swanson, K.R. Harris y S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Learning Disabilities (pp. 119-212). Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
Geary, D.C. y Brown, S.C. (1991). Cognitive addition: strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398-406.
Geary, D.C.; Hamson, C.O. y Hoard, M.K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: a longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236-263.
Geary, D.C.; Hoard, C.O. y Hamson M.K. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for a mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 213-239.
Groth-Marnat, G. (2001). The Wechsler intelligence scales. En A. Kaufman y N.L. Kaufman (Eds.), Specific Learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescent. Psychological assessment and evaluation (pp. 29-51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Handbook of Psychological Assessment. Hobohen, Nueva Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Hanich, L.B.; Jordan, N.C.; Kaplan, D. y Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615-626.
Hoard, M.K.; Geary, D.C. y Hamson, C.O. (1999). Numerical and Arithmetical Cognition: Performance of Low- and Average-IQ Children. Mathematical Cognition, 5, 65-91.
Jordan, N.C.; Kaplan, D. y Hanich, L.B. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586–597.
Jordan, N. C.; Hanich, L. B. y Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Developmental, 74, 834-850.
Keogh, B. (1990). Definitional assumptions and research issues. En H.L. Swanson y B. Keogh. (Eds.), Learning disabilities: theoretical and research issues (pp. 13-19). Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Klinge, V.; Rennick, P.; Lennox, K. y Hart, Z. (1977). A matched-subjeCt comparison of underachievers with normals on intellectural, bahevioral, and emotional variables. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 61-68.
Kosc, L. (1974). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 164-177.
Landerl, K., Bevan, A y Butterworth, B., (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8-9 years old students. Cognition, 93, 99-125.
Lyon, G.R. (1996). Learning disabilities. Special education for students with disabilities. The Future of Children, 6, 54-76. Extraído del sitio web: http://www.ldonline.org/ ld_indepth/general_info/future_children.html
Lyon, G. R.; Fletcher, J.M.; Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A.; Torgesen, J.K.; Wood, F.B., Shulde, A. y Olson, R. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. En C. E. Finn, A. J. Rotherham y C. R. Hokanson (Ed.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259-287). Washington: The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
Ostad, S. A. (1998). Developmental differences in solving simple arithmetic word problems and simple number-fact problems: A comparison of mathematically normal and mathematically disabled children. Mathematical Cognition, 4, 1-19.
Ostad, S. A. (2002). Mathematical difficulties: Aspects of learner characteristics in developmental perspective. Neuron, 40, 847-858. Extraído del sitio web: http://folk.vio.no/snorreo/paper1.doc
Sattler, J.M. (1997). Evaluación de la inteligencia infantil. Santafé de Bogotá, Méjico: Manual Moderno (Orig. 1974).
Shalev, R.S., Manor, O. y Gross-Tsur, V. (1997). Neuropsychological aspects of developmental dyscalculia. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 105-120.
Shaywitz, B.; Holford, T.R. y Holahan, J.M. (1995). A Matthew Effect for IQ but Not for Reading: Results from a Longitudinal Study. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 894-906.
Siegel, L.S. (1990) IQ and learning disabilities: R.I.P.. En H.L. Swanson y B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: theoretical and research issues (pp.111-194). Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Siegel, L.S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: a perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304-319.
Siegel, L.S. y Himel, N. (1998). Socioeconomic status, age and the classification of dyslexics and poor readers: the dangers of using IQ scores in the definition of reading disability. Dyslexia, 4, 90-104.
Scruggs, T. E. y Mastropieri, M. A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 25, 155-168.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407
Stanovich, K.E. (1989). Has the Learning Field Lost its Intelligence? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 487-492.
Sternberg, R. J. y Grigorenko, E.L. (2000). Our labeled children. What Every Parent and Teacher Needs to Know About Learning Disabilities. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing Group.
Torgesen, J. (2001). Empirical and theorical support for direct diagnostic of learning disabilities by assessment of intrinsic processing weaknesses. En National Research Center of Learning Disabilities, Learning Disabilities summit: Building a foundation for the White Paper. Extraído del sitio Web: www.nrcld.org/html/information/articles/ ldsummit/
Torgesen, J. y Dice, C. (1980). Characteristics of research in learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 531-535.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.