Building in the face of Adversity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v9i3.13211Keywords:
editorialAbstract
Numerosas investigaciones empíricas y teóricas, se han centrado en el estudio del bienestar en un intento por comprender los factores implicados en la felicidad humana. Generalmente, el bienestar se ha entendido como la evaluación positiva y subjetiva del individuo sobre su vida (Ryff & Singer, 2000). La evidencia empírica muestra los múltiples beneficios que supone para la población presentar niveles altos de bienestar (Diener, 2010; Hone, Jarden, Schofield, & Duncan, 2014), así como los riesgos asociados a bajos niveles de satisfacción (Keyes, 2005, 2010). Es por ello importante trabajar desde la Psicología en el estudio de las variables que facilitan la consecución de satisfacción vital, afecto positivo y, en definitiva, una evaluación subjetiva de bienestar individual y colectivo.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Diener E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S. & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
He, D., Shi, M. & Yi, F. (2014). The mediating effects of affect and loneliness on the relationship between core self-evaluation and life satisfaction among two groups of Chinese adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 119, 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0508-3
Hone, L.C., Jarden, A., Schofield, G.M., & Duncan, S.(2014). Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 4, 62-90. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v4i1.4
Keyes, C.L.M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychol-ogy Quarterly, 61, 121-140. Keyes, C.L.M., Dhingra, S.S., Simoes, E.J. (2010). Change in level of positive mental health as a predictor of future risk of mental illness. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2366–2371. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065
Keyes, C. L. M. & Grzywacz, J. G. (2005). Health as a complete state: the added value in work performance and healthcare costs. Journal of Occupational and Environ-mental Medicine, 47, 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000161737.21198.3a
Martínez-Martí, M. L., & Ruch, W. (2016). Character strengths predict resilience over and above positive affect, self-efficacy, optimism, social support, self-esteem, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12, 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1163403
Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues. A handbook and classification. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500372739
Richardson, G. E. (2002). The meta-theory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10020
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). To be happy or to be self-fulfilled: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In S. Fiske (Ed.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 141–166). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews/Inc.
Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2000). Interpersonal flourish-ing: A positive health agenda for the new millennium. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 (1 Special Issue: Personality and Social Psychology at the Interface: New Directions for Interdisciplinary Research), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_4
Schotanus-Dijkstra , M., Klooster, P.M., Drossaert, C.H.C., Pieterse, M.E., Bolier, L., Walburg, J.A. & Bohlmeijer, E.T. (2016). Validation of the Flourishing Scale in a sample of people with suboptimal levels of mental well-being. BMC Psychology, 4, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0116-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
10.png)
ESCRITOS DE PSICOLOGÍA por 