Ideological-political radicalization and terrorism: a psychosocial approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v10i2.13184Keywords:
Radicalization, Terrorism, Victimization, Competitive Victimization, Psychosocial ApproachAbstract
Ideological-political radicalization and terrorism generate a series of disastrous consequences for the correct functioning of society. Nowadays, polarization and ideological- political radicalization are on the rise. Factors contributing to this are situations of social upheaval like the migratory and economic crisis, as well as terrorism of an ideological-religious nature. The proposal of effective preventive interventions requires a multidisciplinary and systematic study of the phenomenon, in which social psychology is destined to play a central role. The aim of the current revision is to compile a comprehensive proposal of a conceptual nature, which will illustrate the psychosocial processes underlying violent radicalization of groups with extreme political ideologies. Specifically, the aim is to highlight the suitability of analyzing a set of psychosocial variables, which play an essential role in an individual’s personal balance, related to terrorists’ recruitment and the maintenance of extremist groups. Likewise, and as a response to the need to consider new research perspectives when studying the terrorism phenomenon, the part of victimization and competitive victimization in explaining terrorism is analyzed. The findings suggest enough theoretical links to encourage the integration of these constructs in future research.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1243-1284. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556269
Aquino, K., & Byron, K. (2002). Dominating interpersonal behavior and perceived victimization in groups: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship. Journal of Management, 28, 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800105
Aróstegui, J., Calleja, E. G., & Souto, S. (2000). La violencia política en la España del Siglo XX. Cuadernos de Historia Contemporánea, 22, 53-94.
AIVD.(2004). From Dawa to Jihad. The various threats from radical Islam to the democratic legal order. General Inteligence and Security Service.
Barreto, I., & Borja, H. (2007). Violencia política: algunas consideraciones desde la psicología social. Revista Diversitas – Perspectivas en Psicología, 3, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2007.0001.07
Barroso, F. J. (16 de Marzo de 2014). El repunte de los ultras. El País. Recuperado de http://ccaa.elpais.com/ccaa/2014/03/15/madrid/1394901702_112540.html
Bar-Tal, D. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psycho-logical analysis. Political Psychology, 21, 351-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00192
Bar-Tal, D., Chernyak-Hai, L., Schori, N., & Gundar, A. (2009). A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 91, 229-258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383109990221
Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. New York, NY: Henry Hold.
Berry. J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
Borum, R. (2004). Psychology of terrorism. Tampa: University of South Florida.
Cialdini, R. B. (1990). Influencia, ciencia y práctica. Cuáles son los factores determinantes para que una persona diga sí a otra persona. Barcelona: Valls. S. A. Verdaguer.
Comisión Europea (2002, 13 de Junio). Decisión Marco 2002/465/JAI del Consejo, de 13 de Junio de 2002, sobre la lucha contra el terrorismo. Recuperado de http://www.consilium.europa.eu/
Cooper, H. H. A. (1978). Psychopath as terrorist: A psychological perspective. Legal Medical Quarterly, 1, 16-32.
Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2010). Violent radicalization in Europe: What we know and what we do not now. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33, 797-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.501423
De la Corte, L., Kruglanski, A., de Miguel, J., Sabucedo, J. M., & Díaz, D. (2007). Siete principios psicosociales para explicar el terrorismo. Psicothema, 19, 366-374.
Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, W., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10022-000
Gatica, L. A. (2012). ¿Por qué el distanciamiento ideológico disminuye la provisión de bienes públicos? Una explicación basada en el empleo clientelar. Estudios de Economía, 39, 27-51.
Gurr, T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hogg, M. A. (2012). Uncertainty-identity theory. En P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 62–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n29
Hogg, M. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414540168
Hogg, M. A. (2015). To belong or not to belong: some self-conceptual and behavioural consequences of identity uncertainty / Pertenecer o no pertenecer: algunas consecuencias de la incertidumbre identitaria en el autoconcepto y en el comportamiento. Revista de Psicología Social, 30, 586-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2015.1065090
Horgan, J. (2006). Psicología del Terrorismo. Cómo y por qué alguien se convierte en terrorista. Barcelona: Gedisa S. A.
Hubbard, D. G. (1983). The psychodynamics of terrorism. En Y. Alexander, & T. Adeniran (Eds.), International Violence (pp. 45-52). Nueva York, NY: Praeger.
Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (2002).Polarization, politics and property rights: Links between inequality and growth, Public Choice, 111, 127-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015168000336
King, M., & Taylor, D. M. (2011). The radicalization of homegrown jihadists: A review of theoretical models and social-psychological evidence. Terrorism and Political Violence, 23, 602-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2011.587064
Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Inside the terrorist mind. Paper presented to the National Academy of Science. Washington, D. C.
Lynch, J., & McGoldrick, A. (2005). Peace Journalism. Stroud: Hawthorn Press.
Moyano, M. (2010). Factores psicosociales contribuyentes a la radicalización islamista de jóvenes en España. Construcción de un instrumento de evaluación. Tesis Doctoral de Departamento de Psicología Social y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento. Universidad de Granada, Granada.
Moyano, M., & Trujillo, H. M. (2013). Radicalización islamista y terrorismo. Claves psicosociales. Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada.
Nadler, A., & Saguy, T. (2003). Reconciliation between nations: Overcoming Emotional deterrents to ending conflicts between groups. En H. Langholtz & C. E. Stout (Eds.), The psychology of diplomacy (pp. 29-46). New York, NY: Praeger.
Nadler, A, & Shnabel, N. (2008) Instrumental and socioemotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the needs-based model of socioemotional reconciliation. En A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J.D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37-56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300314.003.0003
Noor, M., Brown, J.R., & Prentice, G. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X238751
Noor, M., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Nadler, A. (2012). When suffering begets suffering the psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440048
Post, J.M. (15 November, 2001). The mind of the terrorist: individual and group psychology of terrorist behaviour. Testimony prepared for subcommittee on merging threats and capabilities, Senate Armed Services Committee, EEUU.
Raufer, X. (2006). Prólogo. En J. Horgan (Ed.), Psicología del Terrorismo. Cómo y por qué alguien se convierte en terrorista (pp. 9-13). Barcelona: Gedisa S. A.
Sabucedo, J. M., Blanco, A., & De la Corte, L. (2003). Beliefs which legitimize political violence against the innocent. Psicothema, 15, 550-555.
Sabucedo, J. M., Rodríguez-Casal, M., & Fernández-Fernández, C. (2002). Construcción del discurso legitimador del terrorismo. Psicothema, 14, 72-77.
Sánchez-Jiménez, J. (2010). Enfrentamiento partidista y polarización social: concepto y fases del proceso (1980-2000). Revista de Historia Contemporánea, 9, 35-51. https://doi.org/10.14198/PASADO2010.9.03
Schmid, A. P. (2011). The Routledge handbook of terrorism research. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Schmid, A. P., & Jongman, A. J. (1988). Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories and literature. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Schwartz, S.J., Dunkel, C.S., & Waterman, A.S. (2009). Terrorism: An identity theory perspective. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 32, 537-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100902888453
Skoczylis, J. J. (2015). The local prevention of terrorism: Strategy and practice in the fight against terrorism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137499011
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tausch, N., Becker, J., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., et al. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and non-normative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728
Tejerina, B. (1997). Ciclo de protesta, violencia política y movimientos sociales en el País Vasco. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 16, 7-38.
Trujillo, H. M. (2009). Hacia una mejor comprensión psicológica del terrorismo: reclutamiento, ideología y violencia. Revista de Psicología Social, 24, 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347409788041426
Trujillo. H. M., León, C., Sevilla, D., & González-Cabrera, J. (2010). Riesgo de radicalización islamista en las mezquitas de una ciudad española. Psicología Conductual/Behavioral Psychology, 18, 434-440.
Trujillo, H. M., Moyano, M., León, C., Valenzuela, C. C., & González-Cabrera, J. (2006). De la agresividad a la violencia terrorista: Historia de una patología psicosocial previsible (Parte II). Psicología Conductual/Behavioral Psychology, 14, 289-303.
Turner, J.C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorisation theories. En N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford: Blackwell.
Varela-Rey, A., Rodríguez-Carballeira, Á., & Martín-Peña, J. (2013). Psychosocial analysis of ETA’s violence legitimation discourse. Revista de Psicología Social, 28, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347413804756050
Victoroff, J. (2005). The Mind of the Terrorist: A Review and Critique of Psychological Approaches. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49, 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704272040
Victoroff, J. (2009). Suicide terrorism and the biology of significance. Political Psychology, 30, 397-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00704.x
Volkan, V. D. (2001). Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: An aspect of large-group identity. Group Analysis, 34, 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/05333160122077730
Wheeler, W. (17 de noviembre de 2012). Europe´s new fascists. The New York Times. Recuperado de http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/opinion/sunday/europes-new-fascists.html?_r=1
Wieviorka, M. (1992). Terrorismo y violencia policía. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 2, 169-178.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.