The Student Satisfaction with Educational Podcasts Questionnaire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v10i2.13183Keywords:
Podcast, M-learning, Questionnaire, Higher educationAbstract
Student satisfaction with podcasts is frequently used as an indicator of the effectiveness of educational podcasting. This aspect has usually been assessed through surveys or interviews in descriptive studies, but no standard questionnaire exists that can be used to compare results. The main aim of this study was to present the Student Satisfaction with Educational Podcasts Questionnaire (SSEPQ). The SSEPQ consists of 10 items that are scored on a Likert-type scale. The items address the opinions of students on content adequacy, ease of use, usefulness, and the benefits of podcasts for learning. 3-5 minute podcasts were assessed as a supplementary tool within the research methods and statistics course of their psychology undergraduate degree. Confirmatory factor analysis with cross-validation showed a one-factor structure, supporting the use of the total score as a global index of student satisfaction with podcasts. The results suggest that there is a high level of satisfaction with podcasts as a tool to improve learning. The questionnaire is a brief and simple tool that can provide lecturers with direct feedback from their students, and may prove useful in improving the teaching-learning process.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abdous, M., Facer, B. C., & Yen, C. (2012). Academic effectiveness of podcasting: A comparative study of integrated versus supplemental use of podcasting in second language classes. Computers and Education, 58, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.021
Abt, G., & Barry, T. (2007). The quantitative effect of students using podcasts in a ?rst-year undergraduate exercise physiology module. Bioscience Education, 10, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.10.8
Alonso-Arbiol, I. (2009). Use of audio likes improves students’ performance in higher education. In A. Lazinica and C. Calafate (Eds.), Technology education and development (pp. 447-456). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/7271
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004181331049
Bolden, B., & Nahachewsky, J. (2015). Podcast creation as transformative music engagement. Music Education Research, 17, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2014.969219
Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers and Education, 55, 714-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.004
Browne M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen and J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Burke, S., & Cody, W. (2014). Podcasting in undergraduate nursing programs. Nurse Educator, 39(5), 256-259. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000059
Carvalho, A., Aguiar, C., & Maciel, R. (2009). A taxonomy of podcast and its application to higher education. In ALT-C 2009 “In dreams begins responsibility” – choice, evidence and change, 8-10 September 2009, Manchester. Retrieved from http://repository.alt.ac.uk/638/1/ALT-C_09_proceedings_090806_web_0161.pdf
Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24, 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518
Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers and Education, 50, 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.016
Fernández, V., Simo, P., & Sallan, J. M. (2009). Podcasting: A new technological tool to facilitate good practice in higher education. Computers and Education, 53, 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.014
Heilesen, S. B. (2010). What is the academic efficacy of podcasting? Computers andEducation, 55, 1063-1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.002
Hill, J. L., & Nelson, A. (2011). New technology, new pedagogy? Employing video podcasts in learning and teaching about exotic ecosystems. Environmental Education Research, 17, 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.545873
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for the indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kay, R., & Kletskin, I. (2012). Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach mathematics in higher education. Computers and Education, 59, 619-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.007
Lakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Pascot, D. (2007). Evaluation of the effectiveness of podcasting in teaching and learning. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (pp. 6181–6188). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Lee, M. J. K., & Chan, A. (2007). Reducing the effects of isolation and promoting inclusivity for distance learners through podcasting. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 8, 85-104.
Leijen, A., Lam, I., Wildschut, L., Simons, P. R. J., & Admiraal, W. (2009). Streaming video to enhance students’ reflection in dance education. Computers and Education, 52, 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.010
McGarr, O. (2009). A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 209-321. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1136
Montealegre, M. C., Carvajal, D., Holguín, A., Pedraza, R., & Jaramillo, C. A. (2010). Implementation of podcast and clickers in two biology courses at Los Andes University and impact evaluation in the teaching-learning process. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2, 1767-1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.981
Narula, N., Ahmed, L., & Rudkowski, J. (2012). An evaluation of the ‘5 Minute Medicine’ video podcast series compared to conventional medical resources for the internal medicine clerkship. Medical Teacher, 34, E751-E755. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.689446
O´Bannon, B. W., Lubke, J. K., Beard, J. L., & Britt, V. G. (2011). Using podcasts to replace lecture: Effects on student achievement. Computers and Education, 57, 1885-1892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.001
Pegrum, M., Bartle, E., & Longnecker, N. (2015). Can creative podcasting promote deep learning? The use of podcasting for learning content in an undergraduate science unit. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12133
Popova, A., & Edirisingha, P. (2010). How can podcasts support engaging students in learning activities? Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2, 5034-5038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.816
Popova, A., Kirschner, P. A., & Joiner, R. (2014). Effects of primer podcasts on stimulating learning from lectures: How do students engage? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12023
Reychav, I., & Wu, W. (2015). Mobile collaborative learning: The role of individual learning in groups through text and video content delivery in tablets. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.019
Román, P., & Solano, I. M. (2010). Sistemas de audio y vídeo por Internet. En I. M. Solano (ed.), Podcast educativo. Aplicaciones y orientaciones del m-learning para la enseñanza (pp. 55-74). Sevilla: Editorial MAD.
Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58, 935-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
Steiger, J. H. (2000). Point estimation, hypothesis testing, and interval estimation using the RMSEA: Some comments and a reply to Hayduk and Glaser. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_1
Sun, J. (2005). Assessing goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 37, 240-256.
Taylor, L., & Clark, S. (2010). Educational design of short, audio-only podcasts: The teacher and student experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 386-399. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1082
Traphagan, T., Kusera, J. V., & Kishi, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9128-7
Vajoczki, S., Watt, S., Marquis, N., & Holshausen, K. (2010). Podcasts: Are they an effective tool to enhance student learning? A case study from McMaster University, Hamilton Canada. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19, 349-362.
Van Zanten, R., Somogyi, S., & Curro, G. (2012). Purpose and preference in educational podcasting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 130-138. https://doi.org/20.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01153.x
Vogele, C., & Gard, E. T. (2006). Podcasting for corporations and universities: Look before you leap. Journal of Internet Law, 10, 3-13.
Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719-751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
Wieling, M., & Hofman, W. (2010). The impact of online video lecture recordings and automated feedback on student performance. Computers and Education, 54, 992-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.