Burnout Syndrome Profiles among Teachers

Authors

  • Mary Sandra Carlotto Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)/RS-Brasil Brazil
  • Sheila Gonçalves Câmara Fundação Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, (UFCSPA)/RS-Brasil. Brazil

Keywords:

Burnout Syndrome, occupational stress, occupational health, teachers

Abstract

Burnout Syndrome (BS) is a psychological reaction related to chronic occupational stress, both interpersonal and emotional. This study assessed three discriminant profiles of BS in teachers according to psychosocial factors. Profile 1 represents teachers with or without BS; Profile 2 represents teachers with BS or without BS in reference to the dimension guilt; and Profile 3 represents Profile 1 and Profile 2. The sample comprised 679 Brazilian primary school teachers. The instruments used were: sociodemographic data questionnaire; Spanish Burnout Inventory; and Battery of Psychosocial Risk Assessment to assess role ambiguity, social support, self-efficacy, autonomy, role conflict, and overload and intention to leave the profession. Differences between the groups were assessed using discriminant analysis. Results show that the variables that compose the discriminant profiles (Profile 1 and Profile 2) were intention to leave the profession, overload, role conflict, and role ambiguity, with self-efficacy discriminating teachers without BS in Profile 1. Profiles 1 and 2 were discriminated by two determinant factors: role conflict, and intention to leave the profession. The results suggest a need for interventions on psychosocial stressors to prevent burnout.

Downloads

Metrics

Visualizaciones del PDF
380
Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202637
|

References

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

2. Bakker, A. B., & Costa, P. L. (2014). Chronic job burnout and daily functioning: a theoretical analysis. Burnout Research, 1, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2014.04.003

3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job Demands–Resources theory. In C. Cooper & P. Chen (Eds.), Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (pp. 37-64). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell019

4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands-Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

5. Barbosa, R. de F. M. & Brito, R. dos. R. (2016). Mecanismo de gestão na instituição escolar. Desafios: Revista Interdisciplinar da Universidade Federal do Tocantins, 2, 85-99. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.2359-3652.2016v2n2p85

6. Beer, L. T., Pienaar, J., & Rothmann, S. Jr. (2016). Work overload, burnout, and psychological ill-health symptoms: A three-wave mediation model of the employee health impairment process. Anxiety Stress Coping, 29, 387-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2015.1061123

7. Carlotto, M. S. (2012). Síndrome de Burnout em professores: Avaliação, fatores associados e intervenção. Porto/Portugal: LivPsic.

8. Carlotto, M. S., Dias, S. R. da S., Batista, J. B. V., & Diehl, L. (2015). O papel mediador da autoeficácia na relação entre a sobrecarga de trabalho e as dimensões de Burnout em professores. Psico-USF, 20, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200102

9. Chirico, F. (2016). Job stress models for predicting burnout syndrome: a review. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 52, 443-456. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_03_17

10. Federici, R. A., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2012). Principal self-efficacy: relations with burnout, job satisfaction and motivation to quit. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9183-5

11. Gil-Monte, P. R., Carlotto, M. S., & Câmara, S. G. (2010). Validation of the Brazilian version of the “Spanish Burnout Inventory” in teachers. Revista de Saúde Pública, 44, 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102010000100015

12. Gil-Monte, P. R. (2012). The influence of guilt on the relationship between burnout and depression. European Psychologist, 17, 231-236. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000096

13. Gil-Monte, P. R. (2005). El síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (“burnout”). Una enfermedad laboral en la sociedad del bienestar. Madrid: Pirámide.

14. Gil-Monte, P. R. (2008). El síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (burnout) como fenómeno transcultural. Informació Psicológica, 91-92, 4-11.

15. Gil-Monte, P. R. (2011). CESQT. Cuestionario para la Evaluación Del Síndrome de Quemarse por el Trabajo [SBI. Spanish Burnout Inventory]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.

16. Guidetti, G., Viotti, S., Gil-Monte, P. R. & Converso, D. (2017). Feeling guilty or not guilty. Identifying burnout profiles among Italian Teachers. Current Psychology, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9556-6

17. Leung, D. Y. P., & Lee, W. W. S. (2006). Predicting intention to quit among Chinese teachers: Differential predictability of the components of burnout. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 19, 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800600565476

18. Lorente, P. L., Salanova, S. M., Martinez, I, & Schaufeli, W. (2008). Extension of the job demands-resources model in the prediction of burnout and engagement among teachers over time. Psicothema, 20, 354–360.

19. Lück, H. (2007). Gestão educacional: uma questão paradigmática. Série Cadernos de Gestão (Vol. I. 3a ed). Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.

20. Mahler, D., Großschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2017). Opportunities to Learn for Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Enthusiasm. Education Research International, 2017, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4698371

21. Maslach, C. (2017). Finding solutions to the problem of burnout. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 69, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000090

22. Maslach, C., & Goldberg, J. (1998). Prevention of burnout: News perspectives. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 7, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(98)80022-X

23. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311

24. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1999). The truth about burnout: how organization cause, personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

25. Mede, E. (2009). An analysis of relations among personal variables, perceived self-efficacy and social support on burnout among Turkish EFL Teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10, 39-52.

26. Park, S., Song, Y. M., Ko, G. N., Jhung, K., Ha, K., Lee, Y. R., & Kim, Y. (2016). The Relationship between Personality, Sense of Efficacy, and Stress in Korean Teachers. Psychiatry Investigation, 13, 566–570. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2016.13.5.566

27. Shoji, K., Smoktunowicz, R. C. E., Rogala, A. Benight, C. C., & Luszczynska, A. (2016). Associations between job burnout and self- efficacy: a meta-analysis. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 29, 367-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2015.1058369

28. Yong, Z., & Yue, Y. (2007). Causes for burnout among secondary and elementary school teachers and preventive strategies. Chinese Education and Society, 40, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932400508

29. Xu, L. (2012). The role of teacher’s beliefs in the language teaching-learning process. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2, 1397-1402. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.7.1397-1402

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

Carlotto, M. S., & Gonçalves Câmara, S. (2017). Burnout Syndrome Profiles among Teachers. Escritos De Psicología - Psychological Writings, 10(3), 159–166. Retrieved from https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/espsi/article/view/10050

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2017)

Section

Escritos de Psicología

License

All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>

Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:

  • The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
  • It is not used for comercial purposes.
  • The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.

There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.

Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.