Lo que he aprendido tras 40 años de investigación en personalidad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.vi6.13403Palabras clave:
Emoción, ansiedad, personalidad, sí mismoResumen
Durante los más o menos 40 años en que he realizado investigación sobre personalidad, he tenido diferentes oportunidades de reflexionar acerca del proceso de investigación que, según creo, merece la pena compartir: el reconocimiento del aspecto humano de la ciencia; algunas lecciones procedentes del debate persona-situación; lecciones aprendidas al comparar la investigación en situaciones naturales de alta implicación personal, como el paracaidismo, con sus análogos de laboratorio; el reconocimiento de lo que es erróneo en el concepto freudiano de inconsciente y lo que debería hacerse para reemplazarlo y la conciencia de sesgos en el proceso de revisión de las revistas. Quizás la lección más general que he aprendido es que el avance de la Psicología como una ciencia acumulativa e integradora queda limitado no tanto por su complejidad conceptual, como por la dificultad de los humanos para observarse a sí mismos con objetividad, honestidad, coraje y con el deseo de evitar falsas ilusiones.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
Alker, H. A. (1972). Is personality situationally specific or intrapsychically consistent? Journal of Personality, 40, 1-16.
Argyle, M., & Little, B. R. (1972). Do personality traits apply to social behavior? Journal of Theory of Social Behavior, 2, 1-35.
Bern, D. J. (1972). Constructing cross situational consistencies in behavior: Some thoughts on Alker’s critique of Mischel. Journal of Personality, 40, 17-26.
Bern, D. J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of’ the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81,506-520.
Block, J. (1968). Some reasons for the apparent inconsistency of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 210-212.
Bowners, K.S. (1973). Situationism in psycology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307-336.
Catlin, G., & Epstein, S. (1992). Unforgettable experiences. The relation of life-events to basic beliefs about self and world. Social Cognition, 10, 189-209.
Day, H. D., Marshall, D., Hamilton, B., & Christy, J. (1983). Some cautionary notes regarding the use of aggregated scores as a measure of behavioral stability, Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 97-109.
Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between experiential and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819-829.
Denes-Raj, V., Epstein, S., & Cole, J. (1995). The generality of the ratio-bias phenomenon. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 1083-1092.
Ekehammar, B. (1974). Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1026-1048.
Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 956-974.
Epstein, S. (1962). Theory and experiment on the measurement of drive and conflict. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 10, pp. 127-209). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited, or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404-416.
Epstein, S. (1976). Anxiety, arousal, and the self-concept. In 1. G. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 3, pp. 183-224). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Epstein, S. (1977). Traits are alive and well. En S. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 83-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Epstein, S. (1979a). The stability of behavior: 1. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097-1126.
Epstein, S. (1979b). Explorations in personality today and tomorrow. American Psychologist, 34, 649-65 3.
Epstein, S. (1980a). The self-concept: A review and the proposal of an integrated theory of personality. En E. Staub (Ed.), Personality: Basic issues and current research (pp. 82-132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Epstein, S. (1980b). The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 790-806.
Epstein, S. (1983a). A research paradigm for the study of personality and emotions. In M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 91-154). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Epstein, S. (1983b). Natural healing processes of the mind: H. Graded stress inoculation as an inherent coping mechanism. En D. Meichenbaum & M. Jaremko (Eds.), Stress prevention and management. A cognitive behavioral approach (pp. 39-66). New York: Plenum.
Epstein, S. (1983c). The unconscious, the preconscious, and the self-concept. En J. Suls & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 219-247). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Epstein, S. (1983d). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360-392.
Epstein, S. (1984). The stability of behavior across time and situations. En R. Zucker, J. Arnoff, & A. I. Rabin (Eds.), Personality and the prediction of behavior (pp. 209-268). San Diego: Academic Press.
Epstein, S. (1985). The implications of cognitive-experiential self-theory for research in social psychology and personality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 15,283-310.
Epstein, S. (1986). Does aggregation produce spuriously high estimates of behavior stability? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1199-12 10.
Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. En L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research: Theory and research (pp. 165-192). New York: Guilford.
Epstein, S. (1991a). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: Implications for developmental psychology. En M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Vol. 23. Self-processes and development (pp. 79-123). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Epstein, S. (1991b). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative theory of personality. En R. C. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology (pp. 111-137). New York: Guilford.
Epstein, S. (1991c). The self-concept, the traumatic neurosis, and the structure of personality. En D. Ozer, J. M. Healy, Jr., & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (Vol. 3, Part A, pp. 63-98). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Epstein, S. (1993a). Implications of cognitive-experiential self-theory for personality and developmental psychology. En D. Funder, R. Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasey, & K. Widaman (Eds.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (pp. 399-438). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Epstein, S. (1993b). Bereavement from the perspective of cognitive-experiential selftheory. En M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement. Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 112-125). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, S. (1994a). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
Epstein, S. (1994b). Trait theory as personality theory: Can a part be as great as the whole? Psychological Inquiry, 5, 120-122.
Epstein, S., & Burstein, K. (1966). A replication of H vland’s study of generalization to frequencies of tone. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 782-784.
Epstein, S., Denes-Raj, V, & Pacini, R. (in press). The Linda problem revisited from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Epstein, S., & Fenz, W. D. (1965). Steepness of approach and avoidance gradients in humans as a function of experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1-12.
Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C., & Huh, E. (1992). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: Evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 328-339.
Epstein S., & Morling, B. (1995). Is the self motivated to do more than enhance and verify itself? In M. H. Kemis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 9-29). New York: Plenum.
Epstein S., & O’Brien, E. J. (1985). The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 513-537.
Fenz, W. D., & Epstein, S. (1962). Measurement of approachavoidance conflict by a stimulus dimension in a test of thematic apperception. Journal of Personality, 30, 613-632.
Fenz, W. D., & Epstein, S. (1967). Gradients of physiological arousal of experienced and novice parachutists as a function of an approaching jump. Psychosomatic Medicine, 29, 33-5 1.
Fenz, W. D., & Epstein, S. (1968). Specific and general inhibitory reactions associated with the mastery of stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 52-56.
Golding, S. L. (1975). Flies in the ointment: Methodological problems in the analysis of the percentage of variance due to persons and situations. Psychological Bulletin, 82,278-288. 3
Hovland, C. L. (1937). The generalization of conditioned responses: I. The sensory generalization of conditioned responses with varying frequencies of tone. Journal of General Psychology, 17, 125-148.
Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
Mischel, W. (1983). Alternatives in the pursuit of predictability and consistency of persons: Stable data that yield unstable interpretations. Journal of Personality, 51, 578—604.
Mischel, W. (1984). Convergences and challenges in the search for consistency. American Psychologist, 39, 351-364.
Mischel, W. (1990). Personality dispositions revisited and revised: A view after three decades. En L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 11134). New York: Guilford.
Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1982). Beyond déjà vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89, 730-755.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). An appreciation of Donald T. Campbell. Psychological Science, 2,213-221.
Sarason, I. G., Smith, R. E., & Diener, E. (1975). Personality research: Components of variance attributable to the person and the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 199-204.
Sedikides, C. (1993). Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 317-338.
Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1995). The multiply motivated self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1330-1335.
Shweder, R.A. (1975). How relevant is an individual difference theory of personality? Journal of Personality, 43, 455-484.
Swann, W. B., Griffin, J. J., Predmore, S., & Gaines, B. (1987). The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 881-889.
Swann, W. B., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1989). Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 782-79 1.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3-20). New York: Cambridge University Press
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Todos los contenidos publicados en Escritos de Psicología están sujetos a la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimento-NoComercia-Compartirigual 4.0 cuyo texto completo puede consultar en <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
- Se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
Los derechos de autor son de dos clases: morales y patrimoniales. Los derechos morales son prerrogativas perpetuas, irrenunciables, intransferibles, inalienables, inembargables e imprescriptibles. De acuerdo con la legislación de derechos de autor, Escritos de Psicología reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de los autores/as, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial. Los derechos patrimoniales, se refieren a los beneficios que se obtienen por el uso o divulgación de las obras. Escritos de Psicología se publica en open access y queda autorizada en exclusiva para realizar u autorizar por cualquier medio el uso, distribución, divulgación, reproducción, adaptación, traducción o transformación de la obra.
Es responsabilidad de los autores/as obtener los permisos necesarios de las imágenes que están sujetas a derechos de autor.