Fluctuatio animi and precariousness. Affective dispositions of corporeality in Spinoza and Butler

Authors

  • Leila Jabase Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v28i3.15717

Keywords:

Affects, body, fluctuation, individuation, precariousness.

Abstract

We will deal here with the relationship between Spinoza and Butler with regard to the affective constitution of every body. We will see how, for Butler, the life of the individual is presented in conditions of precariousness and vulnerability and, for Spinoza, in a constant state of soul fluctuation in which external causes affect us in a way that can often involve our own disintegration. We will see how both philosophies converge on this point. We will also attend to Butler's interpretation of the Spinozian concept of conatus and “desire” as the very nature of every human individual.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abdo Ferez, M. Cecilia (2009), “Ante la política como ‘teología sustitutoria’: un análisis de la relación entre dolor y poder en Richard Rorty y Judith Butler” en Question/Cuestión, 22:1. Recuperado a partir de: https://perio.unlp.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/question/article/view/749
Balibar, Etienne (2009), Spinoza de la individualidad a la transindividualidad, Córdoba: Encuentro Grupo Editor.
Butler, Judith (1988) “Performative Acts and Gender. Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory”, Theatre Journal, 40:4, pp. 519-531. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3207893
Butler, J. (2006) “Violencia, duelo, política”, en Vida precaria. El poder del duelo y la violencia. Buenos Aires: Paidós, pp. 45-78.
Butler, J. (2010), Marcos de guerra. Las vidas lloradas, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Butler, J. (2015), “The desire to live. Spinoza’s Ethics under pressure”, en Senses of the subject, New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 63-89. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827152.111




Descartes, R. (2002) Principios de la filosofía, Barcelona: Alianza.
Gatens, Moira (2009), (ed.) Feminist interpretations of Benedict Spinoza, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
[Datos de autoría suprimidos para evaluación ciega].
[Datos de autoría suprimidos para evaluación ciega].
Kearney, R. (1982), “Ethics of the Infinite” An interview with Emmanuel Levinas en Cohen, R., (ed.). Face to Face with Levinas, Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 13-33.
Sangiacomo, Andrea (2019), “A Spinozistic Approach to Relational Autonomy: The Case of Prostitution” en Spinoza and Relational Autonomy. Being With Others, Aurelia Armstrong, Keith Green, Andrea Sangiacomo (eds), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 194-211.
Sharp, Hasana (2011), Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Spinoza, B. (1925) Opera quae supersunt omnia, Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, editada por Carl Gebhardt, 4 tomos, Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Verlag.
Spinoza, B. (2009) Ética, traducción de Vidal Peña, Madrid: Alianza.
Spinoza, B. (2007) Epistolario, traducción de Oscar Cohan, Buenos Aires: Colihue Clásica.
Spinoza, B. (1990) Tratado Breve, traducción de Atilano Domínguez, Madrid: Alianza.
Zourabichvili, François (2014), Spinoza. Una física del pensamiento, Buenos Aires: Cactus.

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Jabase, L. (2024). Fluctuatio animi and precariousness. Affective dispositions of corporeality in Spinoza and Butler. Contrastes. Revista Internacional De Filosofía, 29(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v28i3.15717

Issue

Section

ARTICLES