Reasoned speech (???? ?????????) versus speech in the form of myths (????? ?????) in Plato's Protagoras.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Raphisa.2021.v6i2.13710Keywords:
???????, concessio, civic art, reasoned speech, mythological speechAbstract
This Paper analyzes the ??????? in Plato's Protagoras in its different moments (the concessio and its revelation from the recourse to the anonymous interlocutor (tis)) to show that the deep objective of the dialogue is not the refutation of Protagoras, but rather to show that he is committed (?????????) to the opposite and without the necessary virtue for the reasoned speech (???? ?????????) of the civic art (????????? ??????), in front of which the sophist prefers the applauded beautiful and long speech in the form of a myth (????? ?????) that forgets the pertinent question: ti estín.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aristóteles (1957): Aristotle's Politica, ed. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Heidegger, M. (1956): Was ist das -die Philosophie. Pfullingen: Neske.
Padilla, Ma T. (2003): «La naturaleza del método socrático-platónico», en Topicos, 25, pp. 35-46.
Platón (1903): Platonis Opera, ed. John Burnet. Oxford: University Press.
Rachel, Tad, Charles, ed.s (2012): Plato and the Divided Self. Cambridge: University Press.
Robinson R. (1996): «Elenchus» en Priori (1996), pp. 9-19.
Rodríguez, M. (2007): «De la racionalidad instrumental a la racionalidad simbólica» en La Colmena 56, pp.56-62
González, J. E. (2012): «República I y la crítica al elenchos socrático» en Nova tellus 30/2, pp. 39-72.
Vlastos, G. (1977): Ironic and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press / Cornell University Press.
Vlastos, G. (1994): Socratic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License permitted by the journal: Public Domain. Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions.
