Una breve revisión lógica del argumento cosmológico Kalām
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Palabras clave:
Detalles del artículo
Referencias
Bunge, M., Chasing Reality: Strife over Realism, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 2006.
Craig, W. L., The Kalām Cosmological Argument, New York: Barnes & Noble, 1979.
Englebretsen, G., Bare Facts and Naked Truths: A New Correspondence Theory of Truth, Great Britain: Ashgate, 2006.
Englebretsen, G., Robust Reality. An Essay in Formal Ontology, Germany: Ontos Verlag, 2012.
Fogelin, R. J., “A Reading of Aquinas’s Five Ways”, American Philosophical Quarterly, num. 27, 1990, pp. 305-13.
Jackson, F., “Epiphenomenal Qualia”, Philosophical Quarterly, num. 32, 1982, pp. 127-136.
Kaiser, C. H., “The Formal Fallacy of the Cosmological Argument”, The Journal of Religion, vol. 24, num. 3, 1944, pp. 155-161.
Kenny, A., The Five Ways, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.
Koons, R. C., “A New Look at the Cosmological Argument”, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 34, núm. 2, 1997, pp. 193-211.
McQueen, D., “What Is Aquinas’ Second Way?”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, vol. 11, num. 1, 1994, pp. 23-35.
Simons, P. M., “The Universe”, Ratio, num. 16, 2003, pp. 237-250.
Sobel, J. H., Logic and Theism. Arguments for and against Beliefs in God, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Sommers, F., The Logic of Natural Language, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.
Strawson, P. F. “Truth”, Analysis, vol. 9, num. 6, 1948, pp. 83-97.
van Fraassen, B. C., “‘World’ Is Not a Count Noun”, Noûs, num. 29, 1995, pp. 139-157.