Emotional intelligence, jealousy, propensity for abusiveness and conflict solving strategies in the couple
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v4i1.13312Keywords:
violence between couples, conflict-solving strategies, emotional intelligence, jealousy, propensity for abusivenessAbstract
The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between emotional intelligence, jealousy and the propensity for abusiveness and violent conflict-solving strategies between couples. The predictive capacity of these variables was analysed in a mixed sample of 294 people. The outcomes show that the variables evaluated are significantly associated with the conflict-solving strategies used by the couple. These strategies have a positive association with jealousy and the propensity for abusiveness, and a negative association with emotional intelligence. Similarly, all the variables analysed had a predictive capacity regarding the conflict-solving strategies, especially the couple’s perception regarding such strategies. These outcomes show the relevance of these variables in predicting violence between couples and are suggestive of interventions for its prevention.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Archer, J. A. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651
Ayers, J. A. (1992). Dating violence: Attitudes toward male-inflicted and female-inflicted aggression. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(08), 4351B. (University Microfilms No. AAD92-37346)
Bar-On, R. (1997). The emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): A test of emotional intelligence. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences and control. Nueva York: McGraw–Hill.
Bethke, T. M. y DeJoy, D. M. (1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 36-51. doi:10.1177/088626093008001003
Canto, J. M., Gómez-Jacinto, L. y García, A. A. (2007). Inteligencia emocional y celos. En J. Sánchez y J. Gaya, Inteligencia emocional en educación. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: Sice.
Clift, R. J. W. (2001). An exploratory study of stalking behaviors and intimate abuse perpetration in young adult women. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Clift, R. J. W., Thomas, L.A. y Dutton, D. G. (2005). Two year reliability of the propensity for abusiveness scale. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 231-234. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-5986-x
Corral, P. (2004) El agresor domestico. En J. Sanmartín, El laberinto de la violencia: causas, tipos y efectos. Barcelona: Ariel.
Dobash, R. E. y Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. Nueva York: Free Press.
Dobash, R. E. y Dobash, R. P. (1980). Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. Londres: Open Books.
Dobash R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M. y Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91. doi:10.1525/sp.1992.39.1.03x0064l
Dutton, D. G. (1995). A scale for measuring propensity for abusiveness. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 203-221. doi:10.1007/BF02110600
Dutton, D. G. (1998). The abusive personality: Violence and control in intimate relationships. Nueva York: Guilford Press.
Dutton, D. G., Saunders, K., Starzomski, A. y Bartholomew, K. (1994). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate retationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1367-1386. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01554.x
Dutton, D. G., Landolt, M. A., Starzomski, A. y Bodnarchuk, M. (2001). Validation of the propensitity for abusiveness scale in diverse male populations. Journal on Family Violence, 16, 59-73. doi:10.1023/A:1026528510057
Echeburúa, E. y Corral, P. (2002). Violencia en la pareja. En J. Urra (Comp.), Tratado de psicología forense. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Echeburúa, E. y Fernández-Montalvo, J. (2001). Celos en la pareja: una emoción destructiva. Barcelona: Ariel.
Fernández-Berrocal, P. y Ramos, N. (2004). Desarrolla tu inteligencia emocional. Barcelona: Kairós.
Frude, N. (1994). Marital violence: An interactional perspective. En A. J. Archer (Ed.), Male violence (pp.153-169). Londres: Routledge.
Gelles, R. J. (1974). The violent home: A study of physical aggression between husbands and wives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Goleman, D. (1995). Inteligencia emocional. Barcelona: Kairós.
Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Empirical investigations. Nueva York: Academic.
Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 49, 169-197. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.169
Harris, R. J. y Cook, C. A. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse: It matters who batterers and victims are. Sex Roles, 30, 553-565. doi:10.1007/BF01420802
Henton, J., Cate, R., Koval, J., Lloyd, S. y Chritopher, S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 467-482. doi:10.1177/019251383004003004
Holtzworth-Munroe, A. y Stuart, G. L. (1994). Tipologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences between them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476-497. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarcal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294. doi:10.2307/353683
Johnson, M. P. (2006). Conflict and control: gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003-1018. doi:10.1177/1077801206293328
Johnson, M. P y Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violencein the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00948.x
Martin, D. (1981). Battered wives. Volcano, CA: Volcano Press.
Mayer, J. D. y Salovey, P. (1997). What is emocional intelligence? En P. Salovey y D. Sluyter (Eds.). Emocional development and emocional intelligence: implications for educators (pp. 3-31). Nueva York: Basics Books.
Millar, S. L. y Simpson, S. S. (1991). Courtship violence and social control: Does gender matter? Law and Society Review, 25, 335-365. doi:10.2307/3053802
Perles, F., Moreno, P. y Rando, M. A. (1998). Imagen social de las mujeres víctimas de la violencia familiar. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 521-526. doi:10.1174/021347498760349779
Perles, F. y Moreno, P. (2000). Influencia de la provocación, la descripción de la agresión y el sexo en la percepción social de las víctimas de violencia familiar. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 10, 97-113.
Perles, F. San Martín, J. y Canto, J. (2009). Relación entre los celos y las estrategias de resolución de conflicto en la pareja. Actas del XI Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social. Tarragona.
Petrides, K. V. y Furnham, A. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence: Behavioral validation in two studies of emotions recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39-57. doi:10.1002/per.466
Puente, S. y Cohen, D. (2003). Jealousy and the meaning (or nonmeaning) of violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 449-460. doi:10.1177/0146167202250912
Roy, M (1976). Battered women: A psychosocial study of domestic violence. Nueva York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Shackleford, T. K. y Buss, D. M. (1997). Marital satisfaction in evolutionary psychological perspective. En E. J. Sternberg y M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 7-25). Nueva York: Guilford Press.
Smuts, B. (1995). The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 6, 1-32. doi:10.1007/BF02734133
Straus, M. A. (1971). Some social antecedents of physical punishment: A linkage theory interpretation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 658-663. doi:10.2307/349438
Straus, M. A (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88. doi:10.2307/351733
Straus, M. A. (1990 a). The Conflict Tactics Scales (sic) and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. En M. A. Straus y R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 49-73). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publihers.
Straus, M. A. (1990 b). Injury and frequency of assault and the “representative sample fallacy” in measuring wife beating and child abuse. En M. A. Straus y R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 75-91). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publihers.
Straus, M. A. (1998). Characteristics of the National Violence Against Women Study that might explain the assault rates for both sexes and the even lower rate for women. Unpublishing manuscript, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.
Straus, M. A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. En X. B. Arriaga y S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence en intimate relationships (pp. 17-44). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Straus, M. A. y Gelles, R. J. (1988). Violence in American families: How much is there and why does it occur? En E. W. Nunnally, C.S. Childman y F. M. Fox (Eds.), Troubled relationships (pp.141-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Straus, M. A., Kantor, G. K. y Moore, D. W. (1997). Change in cultural norms approving marital violence from 1968 to 1994. En G.K. Kantor y J. L. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of darkness: Contemporary perspective on family violence (pp. 3-16). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Taylor, S. & Bogdan, R. (1986). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós.
Vandello, J. A. y Cohen, D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scrips that perpetúate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 997-1010. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. Nueva York: Springer.
Wilson, M. y Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8, 3-16.
Winters, J., Clift, R. J. W. y Dutton, D. G. (2004). An exploratory study of emotional intelligence and domestic abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 255-267. doi:10.1023/B:JOFV.0000042076.21723.f3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.