La importancia de comenzar a investigar el rol del establecimiento  de conexiones entre enunciados en la comprensión del discurso oral expositivo

Jazmín  Cevasco

doi:10.24310/espsiescpsi.v7i1.13248

Autores/as

Jazmín Cevasco Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas - Universidad de Buenos Aires Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v7i1.13248

Palabras clave:

Discurso Expositivo, Comprensión, Discurso Oral

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es señalar las aportaciones que los estudios acerca de la comprensión del discurso escrito expositivo, el discurso oral no expositivo y el discurso oral expositivo pueden hacer a la promoción del aprendizaje en el ámbito educativo. A su vez, destacar la importancia de realizar nuevos estudios que consideren las variables que facilitan la comprensión del discurso escrito expositivo, y no se han investigado en relación con el discurso oral expositivo. Con este fin, se presentan estudios acerca del diseño de textos de refutación y procedimientos de revisión de textos en la comprensión del discurso escrito expositivo. A su vez, se presentan estudios acerca del procesamiento de errores del habla, claves prosódicas, conexiones causales, y marcadores del discurso en la coprensión del discurso oral no expositivo. Finalmente, se presentan estudios acerca del rol de los marcadores del discurso, velocidad de dicción y entrenamiento en habilidades cognitivas en la comprensión del discurso oral expositivo. Se señala que la consideración de toda esta serie de estudios puede contribuir a decidir qué cambios introducir en los materiales didácticos escritos para facilitar la comprensión lectora, y qué variables acerca de la comprensión del discurso oral expositivo y no expositivo se puede tener en cuenta a la hora de exponer una clase.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Ariasi, N. y Mason, L. (2011). Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eye-tracking study. Instructional Science, 39, 581–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9142-5

Barr, D. y Seyfeddinipurr, M. (2010). The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 441–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960903047122

Barreyro, J.P., Molinari Marotto, C., Bechis, S. y Cevasco, J. (2012). Comprensión de textos expositivos y métodos sistemáticos de revisión de textos: el efecto del incremento de la densidad de relaciones y la repetición de términos. Investigaciones en Psicología, 17, 9-24.

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M. y Loxterman, J. A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 251–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747763

Bögels, S., Schriefers, H., Vonk, W., Chwilla, D. J. y Kerkhofs, R. (2010). The interplay between prosody and syntax in sentence processing: The case of subject- and object-control verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1036–1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21269

Brennan, S.E. y Schober, M.F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 44, 274–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2753

Britton, B.K. y Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch’s computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.329

Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., y Reynolds, R. E. (2010). The nature of the refutation text effect: An investigation of attention allocation. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 407–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383101

Cevasco, J. (2009). The role of connectives in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 56–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600001475

Cevasco, J. (2010). El interjuego entre los temas de conversación y la conectividad causal de los enunciados conversacionales en el recuerdo del discurso oral espontáneo. Perspectivas en Psicología, 7, 1-7.

Cevasco, J. y van den Broek, P. (2008). The importance of causal connections in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse. Psicothema, 20, 801-806. Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Corley, M. y Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). Why um helps auditory word recognition: The temporal delay hypothesis. PLoS ONE, 6, e19792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019792

Cromley, J.G., Snyder-Hogan, L.E. y Luciw-Dubas, U.A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 687-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019452

Diakidoy, I. N., Kendeou, P. y Ioannides, C. (2003). Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 335–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00039-5

Ferreira, F. y Anes, M. (1994). Why study spoken language processing? In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 33-56). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Flowerdew, J. y Tauroza, S. (1995). The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 435–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014406

Fox Tree, J.E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 709-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1032

Fox Tree, J. E. y Schrock, J.C. (1999). Discourse markers in spontaneous speech: Oh what a difference an oh makes. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 280-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2613

Fraundorf, S.H. y Watson, D.G. (2011). The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 161–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.004

Fraundorf, S.H., Watson, D.G. y Benjamin, A.S. (2012). The effects of age on the strategic use of pitch accents in memory for discourse: a processing-resource account. Psychology and Aging, 27, 88–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024138

Gilabert, R., Martinez, G. y Vidal-Abarca, E. (2005). Some good texts are always better: text revision to foster inferences of readers with high and low prior background knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 15, 45–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.12.003

Gunraj, D. y Klin, C. M. (2012). Hearing story characters’ voices: auditory imagery during reading. Discourse Processes, 49, 137-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.657755

Hayati, A. (2010). The effect of speech rate on listening comprehension of EFL learners. Creative Education, 1, 107-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2010.12016

Ito, K. y Speer, S.R. (2008). Anticipatory effects of intonation: eye movements during instructed visual search, Journal of Memory and Language 58, 541–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.013

Jung, E.H. (2003). The role of discourse signaling cues in second language listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 87, 562-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00208

Kendeou, P., Muis, K.R. y Fulton, S. (2011). Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 365–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01436.x

Kendeou, P. y van den Broek, P. (2005). The role of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 235–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.235

Kendeou, P. y van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory y Cognition, 35, 1567-1577. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193491

Kjelgaard, M.M. y Speer, S.R. (1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolu- tion of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 153–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2620

Kintsch, W. y van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363?394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363

Kraljic, T. y Brennan, S. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50, 194 –231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.08.002

Ladd, D.R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MacGregor, L.J., Corley, M. y Donaldson, D.I. (2010). Listening to the sound of silence: Disfluent silent pauses in speech have consequences for listeners. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3982-3992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.024

Mason, L., Gava, M. y Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 291–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291

McCloskey, M. (1982). Naive conceptions of motion (No. ED 223 415). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University, Department of Psychology.

McCrudden, M. T. (2012). Readers’ use of online discrepancy resolution strategies. Discourse Processes, 49, 107-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.647618

Molinari Marotto, C., Barreyro, J.P., Cevasco, J. y van den Broek, P. (2011). Generation of emotional inferences during text comprehension: Behavioral data and implementation through the landscape model. Escritos de Psicología, 4, 9-7.

Mulder, G. y Sanders, T.J.M. (2012). Causal coherence relations and levels of discourse representation. Discourse Processes, 49, 501-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.692655

Ratebi, Z. y Amirian, Z. (2013). The use of metacognitive strategies in listening comprehension by Iranian university students majoring in English: a comparison between high and low proficient listeners. Journal of Studies in Education, 3, 140-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jse.v3i1.2969

Rasouli, M., Mollakhan, K. y Karbalaei, A. (2013). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy training on listening comprehension in Iranian EFL context. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2, 115-128.

Robinson, S.L., Sterling, H.E., Skinner, C.H. y Robinson, D.H. (1997). Effects of lecture rate on students’ comprehension and ratings of topic importance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 260–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0929

Schafer, A.J., Speer, S., Warren, P. y White, S.D. (2000). Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 169–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005192911512

Sedivy, J., M. Tanenhaus, C. Chambers y Carlson, G. (1995). Using intonationally-marked presuppositional information in on-line language processing: evidence from eye movements to a visual model. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. por J.D. Moore and J.F. Lehman, 375–80. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Selamat, S. y Sidhu, G. K. (2011). Student perceptions of metacognitive strategy use in lecture listening comprehension, Language Education in Asia, 2, 185–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/11/V2/I2/A02/Selamat_Sidhu

Snedeker, J. y Trueswell, J. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 103-130.

Toepel, U., Pannekamp, A. y Alter, K. (2007). Catching the news: Processing strategies in listening to dialogs as measured by ERPs. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3:53.

Trabasso, T. y Sperry, L.L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595-611.

Van den Broek, P. (2010). Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328, 453-456.

Van den Broek, P. y Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1418

Vandergrift, L. y Tafaghodtari, M. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: an empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x

Vidal-Abarca, E., Gilabert, R. y Abad, N. (2002). Una propuesta para hacer buenos textos expositivos: Hacia una tecnología del texto. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 25, 499–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021037002762064064

Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, G. y Gilabert, R. (2000). Two procedures to improve instructional text: Effects on memory and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 107-116.

Vidal-Abarca, E., Reyes, H., Gilabert, R., Calpe, J., Soria, E. y Graesser, A.C. (2002). ETAT: expository text analysis tool. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 34, 93–107.

Wagner, M. y Watson, D.G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 905–945.

Weber, A., Braun, B. y Crocker, M.W. (2006). Finding referents in time: eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents. Language and Speech, 49, 367–92.

Zwaan, R.A. y Rapp, D.N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. En M. Traxler y M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, 2nd ed. (pp. 725-764). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.