Efecto mediacional del afecto entre las autoevaluaciones centrales y la satisfacción vital en discapacidad intelectual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v9i3.13217Palabras clave:
Satisfacción con la vida, autoevaluaciones centrales, afecto positivo y negativo, discapacidad intelectualResumen
Este estudio examina el efecto mediacional del afecto en la relación entre las autoevaluaciones centrales (CSE) y la satisfacción vital en personas con discapacidad intelectual. Ciento treinta y cuatro personas con discapacidad intelectual (79 hombres y 55 mujeres) del sur de España completaron la escala de autoevaluaciones centrales (CSES), la escala de afecto positivo y afecto negativo (PANAS), y la escala de satisfacción con la vida (SWLS). La investigación reveló que altos niveles de CSE se asociaban a una mayor satisfacción con la vida. Además, el afecto positivo medió parcialmente la relación entre CSE y satisfacción vital. El modelo final indicó una vía significativa mediante la cual las CSE afectan a la satisfacción vital a través del afecto positivo. Se consideran las limitaciones del estudio y se discuten las implicaciones de los resultados para la mejora de la satisfacción vital en personas con discapacidad intelectual.
Descargas
Métricas
Publicación Facts
Perfil de revisores N/D
Información adicional autores
Indexado: {$indexList}
-
Indexado en
- Perfil de director y equipo editorial
- ##plugins.generic.pfl.profiles##
- Sociedad Académica/Grupo
- N/D
- Editora:
- UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
Para obtener más información sobre un dato, haga clic
##plugins.generic.pfl.maintainedByPKP##
Citas
Atienza, F.L., Pons, D, Balaguer, I y García-Merita, M (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes. Psicothema 12, 314-319.
Baron, R. M. y Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Baudin, N., Blanch, A., Rolland, J.P., Martí-Guiu, M. y Aluja, A. (2014). Core Self-Evaluations, life satisfaction, and sport satisfaction. Escritos de Psicología, 3, 19-24. https://doi.org/10.5231/psy.writ.2014.2507
Brief, A.P. (1998). Attitudes In and Around Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chang, C.-H., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., y Tan, J. A. (2012). Core self evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38, 81-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419661
Danna, K. y Griffin, R. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25, 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500305
DeNeve, K. M. y Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. y Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., y Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, y N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., y Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
Diener, E., Sandvik, E. y Pavo t, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. En F. Strack, M. Argyle y N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119-139). New York: Pergamon.
Diener, E., Scollon, C. N. y Lucas, R. E. (2003). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In P. T. Costa y I. C. Siegler (Eds.), Advances in cell aging and gerontology: Vol. 15 (pp. 187-220). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1566-3124(03)15007-9
Diener, E., Smith, H. y Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.130
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. y Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Dykens, E.M. (2006). Toward a positive psychology of mental retardation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(2), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.76.2.185
Edgerton, R.B. (1996). A longitudinal-ethnographic research perspective on quality of life. In R. L. Schalock (Ed.), Quality of life: Volume I: Conceptualization and measurement (pp. 83-90). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
He, D., Shi, M. y Yi, F. (2014). The mediating effects of affect and loneliness on the relationship between core self-evaluation and life satisfaction among two groups of Chinese adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 119, 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0508-3
Heller, D., Watson, D. y Ilies, R. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 574–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.574
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., y Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., y Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The Core Self-Evaluations Scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x
Judge, T.A., Erez, A., Bono, J.E. y Thoresen, C.J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693
Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A. y Durham, C.C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–88.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E. y Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell- Sage.
Kuppens, P., Realo, A., y Diener, E. (2008). The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.66
Larsen, R. J., Diener, E. y Emmons, R.A. (1985). An evaluation of subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 17, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354108
Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., y Song, L. J. (2004). The construct and criterion validity of meta-mood experience and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.483
Liu, Y., Wang, Z. H., y Li, Z. G. (2012). Affective mediators of the influence of neuroticism and resilience on life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Difference, 52, 833–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.017
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E. y Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616
Perry J, Felce D. (2002) Subjective and objective quality of life assessment: Responsiveness, response bias and resident:proxy concordance. Mental Retardation 40, 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0445:SAOQOL>2.0.CO;2
Perry, J. y Felce, D. (2005). Correlation between subjective and objective measures of outcome in staffed community housing. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00652.x
Preacher, K. y Hayes, A. (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Raphael D., Brown I., Renwick R. y Rootman I. (1996). Assessing the quality of life of persons with developmental disabilities: description of a model, measuring instruments, and initial findings. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 43, 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655960430103
Rey, L., Extremera, N y Durán. M.A (2012). Core self-evaluations, meta-mood experience, and happiness: Tests of direct and moderating effects. Personality and Individual Differences 53, 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2012.03.009
Rey, L. y Extremera, N. y Peláez-Fernández, M.A. (2016). Linking Social Support to Psychological Distress in the Unemployed: The Moderating Role of Core Self-Evaluations. Social Indicators Research 127, 435-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0958-x
Rey, L. y Extremera, N. (2015). Core Self-Evaluations, Perceived Stress and Life Satisfaction in Spanish Young and Middle-Aged Adults: An Examination of Mediation and Moderation Effects. Social Indicators Research 120, 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0601-2
Robles, R. y Paéz, F. (2003). Estudio sobre la traducción al español y las propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de afecto positivo y negativo (PANAS). Salud Mental, 26, 69-75.
Russell, J. E. A. (2008). Promoting subjective well-being at work. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707308142
Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In Eid, M. and Larsen, R. J. (Eds.), The Science of subjective well-being (pp. 97-123). New York: The Guilford Press.
Schwarz, N., y Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In A. Kruglanski y E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385–407). New York: Guilford Press.
Seligman, M. y Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: an introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Shin, D, C. y Johnson, D.M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352944
Silver, R.L. (1982). Coping with and undesirable life event: a study of early reactions to physical disability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Noorthwestern Universtiy, Evanston, Illionois.
Smedema, S; Chan, F; Yaghmaian, R; Cardoso, E; Muller, V; Keegan, J; Dutta, A y Ebener, D. (2015). The relationship of core self-evaluations and life satisfaction in college students with disabilities: evaluation of a mediator model. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28, 341-358
Stoia-Caraballo, R., Rye, M. S., Pan, W., Kirschman, K. J. B., Lutz-Zois, C., y Lyons, A. M. (2008). Negative affect and anger rumination as mediators between forgiveness and sleep quality. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 478–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-008-9172-5
van Leeuwen CM, Kraaijeveld S, Lindeman E, Post MW.(2012). Associations between psychological factors and quality of life ratings in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal cord 50, 174-87. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.120
Vassar, M. (2008). A note on the score reliability for the Satisfaction With Life Scale: an RG study. Social Indicators Research, 86, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9113-7
Vázquez, C. y Hervás, G. (2009). La ciencia del bienestar: fundamentos de una psicología positiva. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A. y Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Todos los contenidos publicados en Escritos de Psicología están sujetos a la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimento-NoComercia-Compartirigual 4.0 cuyo texto completo puede consultar en <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
- Se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
Los derechos de autor son de dos clases: morales y patrimoniales. Los derechos morales son prerrogativas perpetuas, irrenunciables, intransferibles, inalienables, inembargables e imprescriptibles. De acuerdo con la legislación de derechos de autor, Escritos de Psicología reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de los autores/as, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial. Los derechos patrimoniales, se refieren a los beneficios que se obtienen por el uso o divulgación de las obras. Escritos de Psicología se publica en open access y queda autorizada en exclusiva para realizar u autorizar por cualquier medio el uso, distribución, divulgación, reproducción, adaptación, traducción o transformación de la obra.
Es responsabilidad de los autores/as obtener los permisos necesarios de las imágenes que están sujetas a derechos de autor.
10.png)
ESCRITOS DE PSICOLOGÍA-PSYCHOLOGICAL WRITINGS por 