El «filtrado moral» de la violencia física en conflictos de parejas íntimas. Una prueba parcial de la Teoría de la Acción Situacional en función del género
Palabras clave:
filtro moral, violencia de parejas íntima, Teoría de la Acción Situacional, encuesta factorial de viñetasResumen
Según la «Teoría de la Acción Situacional» (TAS) para que un acto violento tenga lugar, el autor debe percibir primero la violen-cia como una alternativa de acción. La probabilidad de contemplar o pensar en los actos de violencia como una opción de respuesta a una provocación dependerá del «filtro moral», es decir, de la interacción en-tre la moralidad del autor y del contexto moral del escenario en el que se encuentra. Aunque algunos estudios han analizado el rol del filtro moral en el proceso de percepción-elección, todavía no se ha investiga-do sobre (1) las diferencias de género en el proceso de contemplación (percepción) de la violencia física como una opción conductual ante un conflicto de pareja íntima; y (2) la generalidad explicativa y predictiva de la TAS respecto al desempeño del filtro moral en función del género. Basándonos en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios, este estudio utiliza una encuesta factorial con viñetas para explorar estos dos aspec-tos. Nuestros resultados indican que no hay diferencias entre hombres y mujeres en los niveles medios de contemplación de la violencia íntima. Además, observamos muchas semejanzas entre hombres y mujeres en los correlatos y predictores involucrados en el filtrado moral de la violen-cia. Sin embargo, las pocas diferencias de género encontradas cuestio-nan la completa efectividad explicativa de la TAS, lo que compromete de alguna manera su referida generalidad.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Métricas
Cargando métricas ...
Citas
Aguinis, H. y Bradley, K. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351-371.
Alexander, C. y Becker, H. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public opinion quarterly, 42(1), 93-204.
Arbach, K. y Bobbio, A. (2018). Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment in Community Health Facilities: A Multisite Longitudinal Study, Psychosocial Intervention, 27(2), 105-112.
Arbach, K; Nguyen-Vo, T. y Bobbio, A. (2015). Violencia física en el noviazgo: análisis de los tipos diádicos en población argentina. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 7(2), 38-46.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651-680.
Barton-Crosby, J. (2017). Situational Action Theory and Intimate Partner Violence: An Exploration of Morality as the Underlying Mechanism in the Explanation of Violent Crime. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Cambridge.
Barton-Crosby, J. (2020). The nature and role of morality in situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 1-17. DOI: 10.1177/1477370820977099.
Brauer, J. y Tittle, C. (2017). When crime is not an option: Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 818-846.
Capaldi, D., Knoble, N., Shortt, J. y Kim, H. (2012). A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence. Partner Abuse, 3, 231-280.
Cobo, R. (2000). Género y teoría social. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 58(25), 5-20.
Daly, K. y Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 497-538.
Di Marco, M., Fernández, M. y Talarico, E. (2022). Amenazas, control y contextos: ¿qué lugar ocupan las mujeres en los relatos de varones que cometieron femicidio íntimo en Buenos Aires, Argentina? Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 45(2), 69-89.
Dobash, E. y Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against Wives: A Case against the Patriarchy. Nueva York: Free Press.
Dobash, R; Dobash, R; Wilson, M. y Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39(1), 71-91.
Duff, S; Nampweya, M. y Tree, J. (2017). Men’s accounts of passion killings in the Namibian context. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21-22), 4940–4959.
Dutton, D. y Nicholls, T. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1 - The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(6), 680–714.
Grasmick, H; Tittle, C; Bursik, R. y Arneklev, B. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
Giles, J. (2004). Growing through adversity: Becoming women who live without partner abuse. A grounded theory study. Nueva Zelanda: Escuela de Psicoterapia, Universidad Tecnológica de Auckland. Recuperado de: https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/245/GilesJ.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
Hamby, S. (2017). A Scientific Answer to a Scientific Question: The Gender Debate on Intimate Partner Violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 145-154.
Hirtenlehner, H. y Leitgöb. H. (2021). Differential self-control effects: Moral filtering and the subsidiary relevance of self-control. International Criminology, 1, 91-106.
Hirtenlehner H., Pauwels, L. y Mesko, G. (2014). Is the effect of perceived deterrence on juvenile offending contingent on the level of self-control? Results from three countries. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 128-150.
Hirtenlehner H. y Treiber K. (2017). Can situational action theory explain the gender gap in adolescent shoplifting? Results from Austria. International Journal of Justice Review, 27, 165–187.
Hyde, S. (2005). The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.
Ivert, A; Andersson, F; Svensson, R; Pauwels, L. y Torstensson Levander, M. (2018). An examination of the interaction between morality and self-control in offending: A study of differences between girls and boys. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 28(3), 282-294.
Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 283-294. Johnson, M. (2005). Domestic violence: It’s not about gender-or is it? Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1126-1130.
Kimmel, M. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J; Neidig, P. y Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 159–176.
Medeiros, R. y Straus, M. A. (2006). A review of research on gender differences in risk factors for physical violence between partners in marital and dating relationships. Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.
Muñoz-Rivas, M; Andreu, J.M; Graña, J.L; O ?Leary, D. y González, P. (2007). Validación de la versión modificada de la Conflicts Tactics Scale (M-CTS) en población juvenil española. Psicothema,19(4), 693-698.
Ngo, F., Zavala, E. y Piquero, A. (2022). Gender, life domains, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A partial test of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278211048946
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P. y Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
Pauwels, L. (2012). How similar is the interaction between low self-control and deviant moral beliefs in the explanation of adolescent offending? An inquiry in sub groups by gender and immigrant background. En Fruili A. y Veneto L. (Eds.), Psychology of Morality (pp. 141-153). Nueva York, NY: Nova.
Piquero, N., Gover, A., MacDonald, J. y Piquero, A. (2005). The influence of delinquent peers on delinquency: Does gender matter? Youth Society, 36, 251-27.
Rodríguez, J.A. (2009). Criminología y Género: Comentarios a partir del Gender Gap. Capítulo Criminológico, 37(4), 161-182.
Rodríguez, J.A. (2014). Violencia en el noviazgo de estudiantes universitarios venezolanos. Archivos de Criminología, Seguridad Privada y Criminalística, 12(6), 1-20.
Rodríguez, M; Valentine, J; Son, J. y Muhammad, M. (2009). Intimate partner violence and barriers to mental health care for ethnically diverse populations of women. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 10(4), 358-374.
Rossi, P. y Anderson, A. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. En P. Rossi y S. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (15-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Russo, N. y Pirlott, A. (2006). Gender-based violence: Concepts, methods, and findings, En F. Denmark, H. Krauss, E. Halpern y J. Sechzer (Eds.). Violence and exploitation against women and girls (pp. 178–205). Blackwell Publishing.
Makepeace, J. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97–102.
Miley, N. (2017). A Test of Wikström’s Situational Action Theory Using Self-Report Data on Intimate Partner Violence. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad del Sur de la Florida.
Neidig, P.M. (1986). The modified Conflict Tactics Scale. Beaufort, S.C: Behavioral Sciences Associates.
Sattler, S., van Veen, F., Hasselhorn, F., Mehlkop, G., y Sauer, C. (2022). An experimental test of Situational Action Theory of crime causation: Investigating the perception-choice process. Social Science Research, 106, 1-18.
Schils, N., y Pauwels, L. (2014). Explaining violent extremism for subgroups by gender and immigrant background: Using SAT as a framework. Journal of Strategic Security, 7, 27–47.
Serrano, A. (2018). Crime contemplation and self-control: A test of Situational Action Theory’s hypothesis about their interaction in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology. 15(1) 93-110.
Sjödin, A. (2017). Offenders of Intimate Partner Violence Aggressive antisocial behavior and mental health. Suecia: Universidad de Gothenburg.
Smith, D. y Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 140-172.
Steffensmeier, D. y Allan, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459-487.
Straus, M.A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(1), 75–88.
Straus, M.A. (1993). Identifying offenders in criminal justice research on domestic violence. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 587–600.
Straus, M.A. y Ramirez, I. (2007). Gender symmetry in prevalence, severity, and chronicity of physical aggression against dating partners by university students in México and USA. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 281-290.
Straus, M. A., y Scott, K. (2009). Gender symmetry in partner violence: The evidence, the denial, and the implications for primary prevention and treatment. En J. Lutzker y D. Whitaker (Eds.), Prevention of partner violence (245-271). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
van Gelder, J., Otte, M. y Luciano, E. (2014). Using Virtual Reality in Criminological Research. Crime Science, 3, 1-12.
Weerman F; Bernasco, W; Bruinsma G. y Pauwels L. (2015). Gender differences in delinquency and situational action theory: A partial test. Justice Quarterly,33, 1182–1209.
Wikström, P.-O. (2004). Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. En J. McCord (Ed.), Beyond Empiricism: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime (1–38). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Wikström, P-O. y Treiber, K. (2010). La violencia como acción situacional. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología,3(4), 333-374.
Wikström, P-O. y Treiber, K. (2016). Social disadvantage and crime: A criminological puzzle. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(10), 1232-1259.
Wikström, P-O. (2011). Does everything matter? Addressing the problem of causation and explanation in the study of crime. En J. M. McGloin, C. J. Sullivan y L. W. Kennedy (Eds.), When crime appears: The role of emergence (pp. 53–72). Nueva York: Routledge.
Wikstrom, P-O. y Kroneberg, C. (2022). Analytic Criminology: Mechanisms and Methods in the Explanation of Crime and its Causes. Annual Review of Criminology, 5, 179-203.
Wikström, P-O; Oberwittler, D; Treiber, K., y Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, C. y Becker, H. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public opinion quarterly, 42(1), 93-204.
Arbach, K. y Bobbio, A. (2018). Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment in Community Health Facilities: A Multisite Longitudinal Study, Psychosocial Intervention, 27(2), 105-112.
Arbach, K; Nguyen-Vo, T. y Bobbio, A. (2015). Violencia física en el noviazgo: análisis de los tipos diádicos en población argentina. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 7(2), 38-46.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651-680.
Barton-Crosby, J. (2017). Situational Action Theory and Intimate Partner Violence: An Exploration of Morality as the Underlying Mechanism in the Explanation of Violent Crime. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Cambridge.
Barton-Crosby, J. (2020). The nature and role of morality in situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 1-17. DOI: 10.1177/1477370820977099.
Brauer, J. y Tittle, C. (2017). When crime is not an option: Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 818-846.
Capaldi, D., Knoble, N., Shortt, J. y Kim, H. (2012). A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence. Partner Abuse, 3, 231-280.
Cobo, R. (2000). Género y teoría social. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 58(25), 5-20.
Daly, K. y Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 497-538.
Di Marco, M., Fernández, M. y Talarico, E. (2022). Amenazas, control y contextos: ¿qué lugar ocupan las mujeres en los relatos de varones que cometieron femicidio íntimo en Buenos Aires, Argentina? Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 45(2), 69-89.
Dobash, E. y Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against Wives: A Case against the Patriarchy. Nueva York: Free Press.
Dobash, R; Dobash, R; Wilson, M. y Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39(1), 71-91.
Duff, S; Nampweya, M. y Tree, J. (2017). Men’s accounts of passion killings in the Namibian context. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21-22), 4940–4959.
Dutton, D. y Nicholls, T. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1 - The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(6), 680–714.
Grasmick, H; Tittle, C; Bursik, R. y Arneklev, B. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
Giles, J. (2004). Growing through adversity: Becoming women who live without partner abuse. A grounded theory study. Nueva Zelanda: Escuela de Psicoterapia, Universidad Tecnológica de Auckland. Recuperado de: https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/245/GilesJ.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
Hamby, S. (2017). A Scientific Answer to a Scientific Question: The Gender Debate on Intimate Partner Violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 145-154.
Hirtenlehner, H. y Leitgöb. H. (2021). Differential self-control effects: Moral filtering and the subsidiary relevance of self-control. International Criminology, 1, 91-106.
Hirtenlehner H., Pauwels, L. y Mesko, G. (2014). Is the effect of perceived deterrence on juvenile offending contingent on the level of self-control? Results from three countries. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 128-150.
Hirtenlehner H. y Treiber K. (2017). Can situational action theory explain the gender gap in adolescent shoplifting? Results from Austria. International Journal of Justice Review, 27, 165–187.
Hyde, S. (2005). The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.
Ivert, A; Andersson, F; Svensson, R; Pauwels, L. y Torstensson Levander, M. (2018). An examination of the interaction between morality and self-control in offending: A study of differences between girls and boys. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 28(3), 282-294.
Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 283-294. Johnson, M. (2005). Domestic violence: It’s not about gender-or is it? Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1126-1130.
Kimmel, M. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J; Neidig, P. y Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 159–176.
Medeiros, R. y Straus, M. A. (2006). A review of research on gender differences in risk factors for physical violence between partners in marital and dating relationships. Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.
Muñoz-Rivas, M; Andreu, J.M; Graña, J.L; O ?Leary, D. y González, P. (2007). Validación de la versión modificada de la Conflicts Tactics Scale (M-CTS) en población juvenil española. Psicothema,19(4), 693-698.
Ngo, F., Zavala, E. y Piquero, A. (2022). Gender, life domains, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A partial test of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278211048946
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P. y Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
Pauwels, L. (2012). How similar is the interaction between low self-control and deviant moral beliefs in the explanation of adolescent offending? An inquiry in sub groups by gender and immigrant background. En Fruili A. y Veneto L. (Eds.), Psychology of Morality (pp. 141-153). Nueva York, NY: Nova.
Piquero, N., Gover, A., MacDonald, J. y Piquero, A. (2005). The influence of delinquent peers on delinquency: Does gender matter? Youth Society, 36, 251-27.
Rodríguez, J.A. (2009). Criminología y Género: Comentarios a partir del Gender Gap. Capítulo Criminológico, 37(4), 161-182.
Rodríguez, J.A. (2014). Violencia en el noviazgo de estudiantes universitarios venezolanos. Archivos de Criminología, Seguridad Privada y Criminalística, 12(6), 1-20.
Rodríguez, M; Valentine, J; Son, J. y Muhammad, M. (2009). Intimate partner violence and barriers to mental health care for ethnically diverse populations of women. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 10(4), 358-374.
Rossi, P. y Anderson, A. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. En P. Rossi y S. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (15-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Russo, N. y Pirlott, A. (2006). Gender-based violence: Concepts, methods, and findings, En F. Denmark, H. Krauss, E. Halpern y J. Sechzer (Eds.). Violence and exploitation against women and girls (pp. 178–205). Blackwell Publishing.
Makepeace, J. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97–102.
Miley, N. (2017). A Test of Wikström’s Situational Action Theory Using Self-Report Data on Intimate Partner Violence. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad del Sur de la Florida.
Neidig, P.M. (1986). The modified Conflict Tactics Scale. Beaufort, S.C: Behavioral Sciences Associates.
Sattler, S., van Veen, F., Hasselhorn, F., Mehlkop, G., y Sauer, C. (2022). An experimental test of Situational Action Theory of crime causation: Investigating the perception-choice process. Social Science Research, 106, 1-18.
Schils, N., y Pauwels, L. (2014). Explaining violent extremism for subgroups by gender and immigrant background: Using SAT as a framework. Journal of Strategic Security, 7, 27–47.
Serrano, A. (2018). Crime contemplation and self-control: A test of Situational Action Theory’s hypothesis about their interaction in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology. 15(1) 93-110.
Sjödin, A. (2017). Offenders of Intimate Partner Violence Aggressive antisocial behavior and mental health. Suecia: Universidad de Gothenburg.
Smith, D. y Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 140-172.
Steffensmeier, D. y Allan, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459-487.
Straus, M.A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(1), 75–88.
Straus, M.A. (1993). Identifying offenders in criminal justice research on domestic violence. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 587–600.
Straus, M.A. y Ramirez, I. (2007). Gender symmetry in prevalence, severity, and chronicity of physical aggression against dating partners by university students in México and USA. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 281-290.
Straus, M. A., y Scott, K. (2009). Gender symmetry in partner violence: The evidence, the denial, and the implications for primary prevention and treatment. En J. Lutzker y D. Whitaker (Eds.), Prevention of partner violence (245-271). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
van Gelder, J., Otte, M. y Luciano, E. (2014). Using Virtual Reality in Criminological Research. Crime Science, 3, 1-12.
Weerman F; Bernasco, W; Bruinsma G. y Pauwels L. (2015). Gender differences in delinquency and situational action theory: A partial test. Justice Quarterly,33, 1182–1209.
Wikström, P.-O. (2004). Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. En J. McCord (Ed.), Beyond Empiricism: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime (1–38). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Wikström, P-O. y Treiber, K. (2010). La violencia como acción situacional. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología,3(4), 333-374.
Wikström, P-O. y Treiber, K. (2016). Social disadvantage and crime: A criminological puzzle. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(10), 1232-1259.
Wikström, P-O. (2011). Does everything matter? Addressing the problem of causation and explanation in the study of crime. En J. M. McGloin, C. J. Sullivan y L. W. Kennedy (Eds.), When crime appears: The role of emergence (pp. 53–72). Nueva York: Routledge.
Wikstrom, P-O. y Kroneberg, C. (2022). Analytic Criminology: Mechanisms and Methods in the Explanation of Crime and its Causes. Annual Review of Criminology, 5, 179-203.
Wikström, P-O; Oberwittler, D; Treiber, K., y Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Descargas
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
2022-12-29
Cómo citar
Rodríguez, J. A., Redondo, A., Belandria, J. ., & Garrido, N. . (2022). El «filtrado moral» de la violencia física en conflictos de parejas íntimas. Una prueba parcial de la Teoría de la Acción Situacional en función del género. Boletín Criminológico, (28). Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/boletin-criminologico/article/view/16091
Número
Sección
Artículos
Licencia
Con la aceptación de este aviso el/los autor/es declara/n:
- Que el artículo se deriva de una investigación propia, que no ha sido publicado en el mismo formato que se presenta y que no está siendo objeto de postulación para su publicación en otra revista simultáneamente y con el mismo formato.
- Que acepta/n someter a evaluación el artículo, y a proceder en el término establecido a las correcciones que se indiquen, como condición para su publicación.
- Que existe conformidad con la política editorial de la revista Boletín Criminológico en lo relativo a la difusión de sus contenidos por correo electrónico en el formato pdf, y a través de su página web y de los directorios de revistas en los que está indizada .
- Que a tal efecto, por la presente el/los autor/es cede/n los derechos de difusión y reproducción del artículo presentado al Boletín Criminológico para todas las ediciones de la revista.
La revista se publica bajo el sistema de licencias Creative Commons según la modalidad «Reconocimiento – NoComercial (by-nc): Se permite la generación de obras derivadas siempre que no se haga un uso comercial. Tampoco se puede utilizar la obra original con finalidades comerciales». La revista se publica y se gestiona mediante el software Open Journal Systems.
3.png)
