Impacto del COVID-19 en la eficiencia de fondos de inversión
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/recta.23.2.2022.19877Keywords:
Inversión socialmente responsable, fondos de inversión, eficiencia, COVID-19, DEAAbstract
In recent decades, investors have been concerned not only with obtaining returns on their portfolios, but also with matching these returns with ethical values related to environmental protection, social responsibility and governance. Thus arises the so-called Socially Responsible Investment, being socially responsible mutual funds one of its most important instruments. In this paper, the data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been considered to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the efficiency of UK socially responsible mutual funds. For this, we have divided our study period into two: pre-COVID and COVID. In this way we will be able to conclude whether there is a difference in the efficiency of the funds according to their level of social responsibility and the analyzed period. The results obtained allow us to conclude that in the pre-COVID period the most efficient funds belong to the group of those with the best ESG rating. Although this group is also the one that has been most affected by the pandemic. The opposite is concluded for the group of those with the lowest ESG rating.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- UMA Editorial. Universidad de Málaga
References
Abate, G., Basile, I., Ferrari, P. (2021). The level of sustainability and mutual fund performance in Europe: An empirical analysis using ESG ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28(5), 1446-1455.
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2175
AitElMekki, O. (2020). Is Socially Responsible Investment Outperforming Conventional Investment or Not? A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management 10, 1760-1784.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2020.1011110
Allevi, E., Basso, A., Bonetti, F., Oggioni, G., Riccardi, R. (2019). Measuring the environmental performance of green SRI funds: A DEA approach. Energy Economics 79, 32-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.023
Ayadi, M.A., Ben Ghazi, Z., Chabchoub, H. (2015). Canadian Socially Responsible Investment Mutual Funds Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis. M. Al-Shammari, H. Masri (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making in Finance, Insurance and Investment, Springer International Publishing, New York, pp. 77-134.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21158-9_5
Babalos, V., Doumpos, M., Philippas, N., Zopounidis, C. (2015). Towards a Holistic Approach for Mutual Fund Performance Appraisal. Computational Economics 46(1), 35 - 53.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-014-9450-y
Ballestero, E., Pérez-Gladish, B., Garcia-Bernabeu, A. (2015). Socially responsible investment. A multicriteria decision making approach. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 219. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11836-9
Banker, R., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30, 1078-1092
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Basso, A. Funari, S. (2001). A Data Envelopment Analysis approach to measure the mutual fund performance. European Journal of Operational Research 135(3), 477-492.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00311-8
Basso, A., Funari, S. (2008). DEA models for ethical and non ethical mutual funds. Mathematics and Methods in Economics Finance 2, 21-40.
Basso, A., Funari, S., (2016). DEA performance assessment of mutual funds. In Zhu, J. (ed.) Data Envelopment Analysis. Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 238. Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 229-287.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7684-0_8
Briec, W., Kertens, K. (2009). Multi-horizon Markowitz portfolio performance appraisals: A general approach. Omega 37(1), 50-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.07.007
Brogi, M., Lagasio, V. (2019). Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26(3), 576-587.
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1704
Cañal Fernández, V., Antomil Ibias, J.¸Rodríguez Uría, M.V. (2009). La selección de carteras socialmente responsables: revisión crítica de la literatura. Rect@ 9(1), 147-172.
Cañal Fernández, V., Gómez Martín, M. (2020). ¿Se puede especular con la conciencia? La evolución histórica de la inversión socialmente responsable. Rect@ 21(1), 65-88.
https://doi.org/10.24309/recta.2020.21.1.05
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 429-444.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Chen, X., Scholtens, B. (2018). The urge to act: A comparison of active and passive socially responsible investment funds in the United States. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25(6), 1154-1173.
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1529
Chu, J., Chen, F., Leung, P. (2010). ETF Performance Measurement - Data Envelopment Analysis, Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM)". 7th International Conference on IEEE, 28-30, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2010.5530245
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 164, Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6151-8
Cowton, C. J. (1992). Accouting and Financial Ethics: from margin to mainstream? Business Ethics: A European Review 8(2), 99-107.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00134
do Castelo Gouveia, M., Duarte Neves, E., Cândido Dias, L., Henggeler Antunes, C. (2018). Performance evaluation of Portuguese mutual fund portfolios using the value-based DEA method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(10), 1628-1639.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0259-7
Freeman, R. E. (1983). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Advances in Strategic Management, 1(1), 31-60.
Friede, G., Busch, T., Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance. Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 5(4), 210-233.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Galagedera, D., Silvapulle, P. (2002). Australian mutual fund performance appraisal using Data Envelopment Analysis. Managerial Finance 28(9), 60-73.
https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350210768077
Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. About Us. (2022). Consultado el 20 de abril de 2022. Disponible en: http://www.gsi-alliance.org/aboutus/
GSI-Alliance (2021). Global Sustainable Investment Review 2020. Consultado el 20 de abril de 2022. Disponible en: http://www.gsi-alliance.org/
Haigh, M., Hazelton, J. (2004). Financial Markets: A Tool for Social Responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics 52(1), 59-71.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033107.22587.0b
Haslem, J. A., Scheraga, C.A. (2003). Data Envelopment Analysis of Morningstar's large-cap mutual funds. The Journal of Investing 12(4), 41-48.
https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2003.319566
Ielasi, F., Rossolini, M. (2019). A New Approach to Sustainable and Responsible Investment: The Sustainability-Themed Mutual Funds. In: La Torre, M., Chiappini, H. (eds) Socially Responsible Investments. Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance. Palgrave Pivot, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05014-6_7
Joro, T., Na, P. (2006). Portfolio performance evaluation in a mean-variance-skewness framework. European Journal of Operational Research 175(1), 446-461.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.006
Kim, C.S. (2019). Can Socially Responsible Investments Be Compatible with Financial Performance? A Meta-analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 48 (1), 30-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12244
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12244
Levitt, A. (1998). The Importance of High-Quality Accounting Standards. Ed: Accounting Horizons, Sarasota, Fla, Vol. 12(1), pp. 79-82.
Matallín, C., Soler, J., Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2014). On the informativeness of persistence for evaluating mutual fund performance using partial frontiers. Omega 42 (1), 47-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.03.001
Mcmullen, P., Strong, R.A. (1998). Selection of mutual funds using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Business and Economic Studies 4(1), 1-14.
Morey, M.R., Morey, R.C. (1999). Mutual fund performance appraisals: A MultiHorizon perspective with endogenous benchmarking. Omega 27 (2), 241-258.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00043-7
Morningstar (2021). Inversión Sostenible. Morningstar Sustainability Ratio. Consultado el 20 de marzo de 2022. Disponible en:
https://www.morningstar.com/content/dam/marketing/shared/research/methodology/744156_Morn ingstar_Sustainability_Rating_for_Funds_Methodology.pdf
Murthi, B. P. S., Choi, Y. K., Desai, P. (1997). Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance Measurement: A non-parametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research 98 (2), 408- 418.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00356-6
Muñoz Fernández, A. (2016). Inversión socialmente responsable - Socially Responsible Investment. EUNOMÍA. Revista En Cultura De La Legalidad 11, 273-284.
https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2016.3293
Pastor, J. T. (1996). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: A generalization. Annals of Operations Research, 66, 93-102.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187295
Pastor, J.T., Ruiz, J.L. (2007). Variables with negative values in DEA. In: Zhu, J., Cook, W.D. (eds) Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA., pp. 63-84.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71607-7_4
Premachandra, I., Powell, J.G., Shi, J. (1998). Measuring the relative efficiency of fund management strategies in New Zealand using a spreadsheet-based stochastic data envelopment analysis model. Omega 26, 319-331
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00002-4
Premachandra, I., Zhu, J., Watson, J., Galagedera, D. (2016). Mutual fund industry performance: a network data envelopment analysis approach in data envelopment analysis a handbook of empirical studies and applications. In Zhu, J. (ed.) International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 238. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp. 165-228.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7684-0_7
Pérez-Gladish, B., Rodríguez, P. M., M'zali, B., Lang, P. (2013). Mutual funds efficiency measurement under financial and social responsibility criteria. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 20(3- 4), 109-125.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1494
Renders, A., Gaeremynck, A., Sercu, P. (2010). Corporate-Governance ratings and company performance: A cross-European study. Corporate Governance: An International Review 18(2), 87-106.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00791.x
Renneboog, L., Horst, J., Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723-1742.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.039
Rubio, J. F., Hassan, M. K., Merdad, H. J. (2012). Nonparametric performance measurement of internal and Islamic mutual funds. Accounting Research Journal 25, 208-226.
https://doi.org/10.1108/10309611211290176
Shahrour, M. H. (2022). Measuring the financial and social performance of French mutual funds: A data envelopment analysis approach. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility 31, 398-418.
https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12424
Solórzano-Taborga, P., Alonso-Conde, A. B., Rojo-Suárez, J. (2018). Efficiency and persistence of Spanish Absolute Return Funds. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa 25, 186214.
https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.2703
Tsolas, I. (2011). Natural resources exchange traded funds: performance appraisal using DEA modelling. Journal of Centrum Cathedra 4(2), 250-259.
https://doi.org/10.7835/jcc-berj-2011-0062
UK Sustainable Investment and Finance Association (UKSIF). About UKSIF. (S/F). Consultado el 21 de abril de 2022. Disponible en https://uksif.org/about
United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEPFI). About Us (S/F). Consultado el 21 de abril de 2022. Disponible en: https://www.unepfi.org/about/.
Wilkens, K., Zhu, J. (2001). Portfolio evaluation and benchmark selection: A mathematical programming approach. Journal of Alternative Investments 4 (1), 9-19.
https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2001.319003
Wang, C. N., Larsen, M. L., Wang, Y. (2020). Addressing the missing linkage in sustainable finance: The'SDG Finance Taxonomy'. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 12(2), 630-637.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1796101
Zhao, X., Wang, S., Lai, K. K. (2011). Mutual performance evaluation based on endogenous benchmarks. Expert systems with applications 38, 3663-3670.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.