Writing Qualitatively, or the Demands of Writing

Authors

  • Max van Manen Emeritus professor in the Faculty of Education at the University of Alberta
  • Paul Smith Freelance translator (www.traducciones.org.es)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/mar.7.1.2026.22997

Keywords:

space of writing, phenomenological method, phenomenological reflection, gaze of Orpheus, desire, hypomnesis, anamnesis, primal impressional consciousness

Abstract

Have you ever said this or heard someone say this: “I have done all of my data analysisI just have to write it down.” Or, “I just have to write it up”? I will suggest that within the context of phenomenological inquiry, it is not necessarily helpful to try to assist researchers learning “how to write down” their reflections or “how to write up” their results. What should be more helpful is learning “how to write.” Qualitative writing may be seen as an active struggle for understanding and recognition of the lived meanings of the lifeworld, and this writing also possesses passive and receptive rhetoric dimensions. It requires that we be attentive to other voices, to subtle significations in the way that things and others speak to us. In part, this is achieved through contact with the words of others. These words need to touch us, guide us, stir us.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Paul Smith, Freelance translator (www.traducciones.org.es)

    Freelance translator with more than twenty years of professional experience in academic and research contexts. He works primarily with scholars and both Spanish and international academic journals, providing specialised translation and editing services. His main areas of activity include research articles, monographs, book chapters, and other academic and scientific texts.

References

Blanchot, M. (1981). The gaze of Orpheus. Station Hill.

Blanchot, M. (1982). The space of literature. University of Nebraska Press.

Blanchot, M. (1993). The infinite conversation. University of Minnesota Press.

Cixous, H. (1997). Rootprints: Memory and life writing—Helene Cixous and Mireille Calle-Gruber. Routledge.

Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs (D. B. Allison, Trans.; preface by N. Garver). Northwestern University Press.

Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. University of Chicago Press.

Derrida, J. (1995). The gift of death. University of Chicago Press.

Derrida, J. & Ferraris, M. (2001). A taste for the secret. Polity.

Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought. Harper & Row.

Heidegger, H. (1982). The basic problems of phenomenology. Indiana University Press.

Husserl, E. (1991). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893-1917) (J. Barnett Brough, Trans.). Kluwer Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3718-8

Lévinas, E. (1978). Existence & existents. Duquesne University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1516-4

Lévinas, E. (1996). The Levinas reader (S. Hand, Ed.). Blackwell.

Lingis, A. (2001). Abuses. University of California Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge Kegan Paul.

Nordholt, A. S. (1997). Het schuwe denken [Bashful thinking]. In A. S. Nordholt, L. ten Kate, & F. Vande Verre (Eds.), Het wakendewoord: Literatuur, ethiekenpolitiekbijMaurice Blanchot (pp. 11-43). SUN.

Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford University Press.

Ovid. (1955). Metamorphoses (R. Humphries, Trans.) Indiana University Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse & the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press.

van Manen, M. (1997) Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Althouse.

van Manen, M. (Ed.). (2002). Writing in the dark: Phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry. Althouse.

Wittgenstein, L. (1997). Philosophical investigations. Routledge Kegan Paul.

Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

Dimensions

PlumX

Issue

Section

STUDIES AND ESSAYS

How to Cite

Writing Qualitatively, or the Demands of Writing. (2026). Márgenes, Revista De Educación De La Universidad De Málaga, 7(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.24310/mar.7.1.2026.22997