Elaboración de un Nuevo Instrumento: Desarrollo y Validación de la Escala de Propiedad Psicológica Familiar Colectiva
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.15.1.2025.18960Palabras clave:
Empresa familiar, Propiedad psicológica colectiva familiar, Identificación de la empresa familiar, Interdependencia de la empresa familiarResumen
Este estudio presenta el desarrollo y validación de la Escala de Propiedad Psicológica Familiar Colectiva (FCPO-S), un instrumento innovador diseñado para medir el sentido compartido de propiedad que los miembros de la familia sienten hacia su negocio. Esta escala capta dos dimensiones críticas: la identificación de la empresa familiar y la interdependencia, las cuales reflejan las conexiones emocionales y estratégicas de los miembros de la familia con la empresa. Al centrarse en estos aspectos socioemocionales, el FCPO-S subraya la dinámica única de las empresas familiares, donde el compromiso colectivo y los lazos afectivos pueden servir como ventajas competitivas significativas. Esta escala constituye una valiosa contribución a la investigación empresarial, proporcionando importantes implicaciones prácticas para la comprensión y gestión de las dinámicas socioemocionales de las empresas familiares.
Descargas
Referencias
Aldamiz-Echevarría, C., Idígoras, I., & Vicente-Molina, M.-A. (2017). Gender issues related to choosing the successor in the family business. European Journal of Family Business, 7(1–2), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.10.002
Astrachan, J. (2009). Using and Abusing Family Business Research. https://www.academia.edu/30097597/Using_and_Abusing_Family_Business_Research
Astrachan, J. H. (2010). Strategy in family business: Toward a multidimensional research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.02.001
Astrachan, J. H., Klein, S. B., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00045.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00045.x
Bachkirov, A. A. (2015). Managerial decision making under specific emotions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2013-0071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2013-0071
Basly, S., & Saunier, P. L. (2020a). Familiness, socio-emotional goals and the internationalization of French family SMEs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-019-00265-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-019-00265-0
Basly, S., & Saunier, P.L. (2020b). Family members’ commitment to the firm and family business continuity: Investigating the mediating role of family-to-firm identity fit and emotional attachment. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1551458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1551458
Batterton, K. A., & Hale, K. N. (2017). The Likert scale what it is and how to use it. Phalanx, 50(2), 32-39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26296382
Bee, C., & Neubaum, D. O. (2014). The role of cognitive appraisal and emotions of family members in the family business system. Family Business Review, 27(3), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514538454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.001
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279.https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
Bettinelli, C., Lissana, E., Bergamaschi, M., & De Massis, A. (2022). Identity in family firms: Toward an integrative understanding. Family Business Review, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865221113675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865221113675
Björnberg, A., & Nicholson, N. (2012). Emotional ownership: The next generation’s relationship with the family firm. Family Business Review, 25(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511432471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511432471
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Boers, B. (2013a). Organizational identity construction in family businesses a dualities perspective. Doctoral Thesis, Monograph. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-21834
Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought. Scientific American, 304, 62-65. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0211-62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0211-62
Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital. In The Sociology of Economic Life (3rd Edition). Routledge.
Bubolz, M. (2001). Family as Source, User, and Builder of Social Capital. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 129–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00091-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00091-3
Cailluet, L., Bernhard, F., & Labaki, R. (2018). Family firms in the long run: The interplay between emotions and history. Entreprises et Histoire, 91(2), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.3917/eh.091.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/eh.091.0005
Cano-Rubio, M., Lombardi, R., Fuentes-Lombardo, G., & Núñez-Cacho, P. (2021). Familiness, business strategy and stakeholder engagement: The internationalisation of Spanish olive oil mills. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2868
Carrasco-Hernandez, A., & Sánchez-Marín, G. (2007). The determinants of employee compensation in family firms: Empirical evidence. Family Business Review, 20(3), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00096.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00096.x
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W. (1998). The determinants of new venture performance: An extended model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879802300101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879802300101
Collazos, C. A., Guerrero, L. A., Pino, J. A., & Ochoa, S. F. (2003). Collaborative scenarios to promote positive interdependence among group members. In J. Favela & D. Decouchant (Eds.), Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use (pp. 356–370). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39850-9_30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39850-9_30
Colombetti, G. (2009). What language does to feelings. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(9), 4-26. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/2009/00000016/00000009/art00001
Corona, J. (2021). Succession in the Family Business: The Great Challenge for the Family. European Journal of Family Business, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i1.12770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i1.12770
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
Croasmun, J. T., & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using Likert-type scales in the Social Sciences. Journal of Adult Education, 40(1). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:141213821
Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Martin, A. (2017). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2057
Davoodi, T., Nelson, L. J., & Blake, P. R. (2020). Children’s conceptions of ownership for self and other: Categorical ownership versus strength of claim. Child Development, 91(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13163
Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & van den Heuvel, H. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.83.5.717
Elsbach, K. D., & Pieper, T. M. (2019). How psychological needs motivate family firm identifications and identifiers: A framework and future research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100289
Fielding, N. G., Blank, G., & Lee, R. M. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods (2nd Edition). SAGE. http://ssc.sagepub.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992
Fink, A. (2003). How To Assess and Interpret Survey Psychometrics. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984447
Finstad, K. (2009). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: evidence against 5-point scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 5(3), 104-110. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2835434.2835437
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Garcés-Galdeano, L., Larraza Kintana, M., & Martínez, B. (2020). Estudio de análisis del peso de la empresa familiar en la economía navarra. Asociación para el Desarrollo de la Empresa Familiar Navarra (ADEFAN) & Europa Press. https://www.adefan.es/las-empresas-familiares-en-navarra-son-mas-rentables-y-longevas-segun-un-estudio-impulsado-por-adefan/
Garcia, P. R. J. M., Sharma, P., De Massis, A., Wright, M., & Scholes, L. (2019). Perceived parental behaviors and next-generation engagement in family firms: A social cognitive perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796087
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Habbershon, T. G., & Astrachan, J. H. (1997). Perceptions and management of the family business: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 10(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00111.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00037.x
Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (1993). How many options is enough for a multiple-choice test item? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(4), 999-1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053004013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053004013
Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and Validating Multiple-choice Test Items (3rd Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203825945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203825945
Hall, A. (2012). Family Business Dynamics: A Role and Identity Based Perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009086
Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00295-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00295-8
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.238
Heino, N., Tuominen, P., Tuominen, T., & Jussila, I. (2019). The socio-psychological challenges of succession in family firms: The implications of collective psychological ownership. In E. Memili & C. Dibrell (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Heterogeneity among Family Firms (pp. 715–746). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77676-7_26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77676-7_26
Henssen, B., & Koiranen, M. (2021). CEOs’ joy of working for the family firm: the role of psychological ownership and stewardship behavior. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2019-0264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2019-0264
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw Hill España. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=775008
Hernández-Linares, R., Sarkar, S., & López-Fernández, M. C. (2017). How has the family firm literature addressed its heterogeneity through classification systems? An integrated analysis. European Journal of Family Business, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.06.003
Hewa Kuruppuge, R., & Gregar, A. (2017). Family involvement, employee engagement and employee performance in enterprising family firms. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65, 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765051695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765051695
Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(95)90050-0
Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory: Contemporary Global Perspectives (pp. 3–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1
Humphrey, R. H., Massis, A. D., Picone, P. M., Tang, Y., & Piccolo, R. F. (2021). The psychological foundations of management in family firms: Emotions, memories, and experiences. Family Business Review, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211012139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211012139
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college what evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389809602629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389809602629
Jöreskog, K. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Kanngiesser, P., Rossano, F., Frickel, R., Tomm, A., & Tomasello, M. (2020). Children, but not great apes, respect ownership. Developmental Science, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12842
Kellermanns, F. W., Dibrell, C., & Cruz, C. (2014). The role and impact of emotions in family business strategy: New approaches and paradigms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.08.002
Kirk, C. P., Peck, J., & Swain, S. D. (2018). Property lines in the mind: Consumers’ psychological ownership and their territorial responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx111
Klein, S. B., Astrachan, J. H., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2005). The F–PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construction, Validation, and Further Implication for Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00086.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00086.x
Koh, A., Kong, E., & Timperio, G. (2019). An analysis of open innovation determinants: The case study of singapore based family owned enterprises. European Journal of Family Business, 9(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v9i2.5678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v9i2.5678
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, pp. 3–90. Jossey-Bass. https://awspntest.apa.org/record/2000-16936-001
Kramsch, C. (2014). Language and Culture. AILA Review, 27(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.27.02kra DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.27.001int
Lowe, N. K., & Ryan-Wenger, N. M. (1992). Test-retest reliability of psychometric instruments: An illustrative example from the clinical nurse specialist role self-efficacy scale. Nursing Research, 41(6), 368–370. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199211000-00014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199211000-00014
Li, W., Wang, Y., & Cao, L. (2023). Identities of the incumbent and the successor in the family business succession: Review and prospects. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1062829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1062829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1062829
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Makó, C., Csizmadia, P., & Heidrich, B. (2018). Heart and Soul: Transferring ‘Socio-emotional Wealth’ (SEW) in Family Business Succession. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2393957517749708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2393957517749708
Márquez, E. (2023). Review of the book Introducción a la psicometría: Teoría clásica y TRI by J. Muñiz. Ed. Pirámide. Revista Psicología, 42(1-2). http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_ps/article/view/27438
Martinović, B., & Verkuyten, M. (2024). Collective psychological ownership as a new angle for understanding group dynamics. European Review of Social Psychology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2023.2231762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2023.2231762
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464984
Muñiz, J., & Bartram, D. (2007). Improving international tests and testing. European Psychologist, 12(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.3.206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.3.206
Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Ten steps for test development. Psicothema, 31(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291
Murphy, L., Huybrechts, J., & Lambrechts, F. (2019). The origins and development of socioemotional wealth within next-generation family members: An interpretive grounded theory study. Family Business Review, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519890775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519890775
Myers, D. G., & Twenge, J. M. (2019). Social psychology. McGraw-Hill. https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/13001
Na, J., & Choi, I. (2009). Culture and first-person pronouns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(11). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209343810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209343810
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985772
Nijs, T., Martinovic, B., Verkuyten, M., & Sedikides, C. (2021). ‘This country is OURS’: The exclusionary potential of collective psychological ownership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12386
Parada, M. J., & Dawson, A. (2017). Building family business identity through transgenerational narratives. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(3), 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2016-0200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2016-0200
Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
Perlovsky, L. (2011). Language, Emotions, and Cultures: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, arXiv:1103.2376. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1103.2376
Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2010). Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: Construct introduction and elaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.628
Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2011). Psychological Ownership and the Organizational Context: Theory, Research Evidence, and Application. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934451.00016
Pierce, J. L., Jussila, I., & Li, D. (2018). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing collective psychological ownership in organizational field settings. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(6), 776–792. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.66 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.66
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.7.1.84
Pozzi, M., Martinelli, D. P., Greiner, A., & Pistoni, C. (2024). Comparing psychosocial well-being in Italian family businesses: Seniors vs. juniors. European Journal of Family Business, 14(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.14.2.2024.19614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.14.2.2024.19614
Rantanen, N., & Jussila, I. (2011). F-CPO: A collective psychological ownership approach to capturing realized family influence on business. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(3), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.07.005
Rau, S. B., Werner, A., & Schell, S. (2019). Psychological ownership as a driving factor of innovation in older family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.001
Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2003). Social identity and self-categorization theories’ contribution to understanding identification, salience and diversity in teams and organizations. In J. Polzer (Ed.), Identity Issues in Groups, 279–304. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-0856(02)05011-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-0856(02)05011-9
Rochat, P. (2014). Origins of Possession: Owning and Sharing in Development. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139424608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139424608
Rochat, P. (2011). Possession and morality in early development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(132), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.294
Sánchez-Marín, G., Carrasco-Hernández, A. J., Danvila del Valle, I., & Sastre-Castillo, M. Á. (2016). Organizational culture and family business: A configurational approach. European Journal of Family Business, 6(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.05.002
Sani, F., & Bennett, M. (2003). Developmental aspects of social identity. In The Development of the Social Self. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203391099_chapter_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203391099_chapter_3
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Education. (5th Edition).
Sherry, J. F. (1993). Review of the book The social psychology of material possessions: to have is to be by Helga Dittmar In To Have Possessions: A Handbook On Ownership And Property Floyd Rudmin Corte Madera, CA: Select Press, 1991. Journal of Macromarketing, 13(2), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/027614679301300211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/027614679301300211
Soler, I. P., Gemar, G., & Guerrero-Murillo, R. (2017). Family and non-family business behaviour in the wine sector: A comparative study. European Journal of Family Business, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v7i1-2.5018
Storz, N., Martinovic, B., Verkuyten, M., Žeželj, I., Psaltis, C., & Roccas, S. (2020). Collective psychological ownership and reconciliation in territorial conflicts. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1145
Su, X., & Ng, S. (2019). Development and validation of the collective psychological ownership scale in organizational contexts. International Social Work, 62(5), 1431–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872818767483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872818767483
Sundaramurthy, C., & Kreiner, G. E. (2008). Governing by managing identity boundaries: The case of family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00234.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00234.x
Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00199.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00199.x
Trevinyo‐Rodríguez, R. N., & Bontis, N. (2010). Family ties and emotions: A missing piece in the knowledge transfer puzzle. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 418-436. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001011068716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001011068716
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Basil Blackwell. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5017495#page=420
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
Tuten, T. L. (2010). Conducting online surveys. In Advanced Methods for Conducting Online Behavioral Research 179–192). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12076-012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12076-012
Vandekerkhof, P., Hoekx, L., & Claus, B. (2022). An exploratory study on the emotional climate within family firms: the impact of emotional dissonance. European Journal of Family Business, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v12i1.10812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v12i1.10812
Van Selm, M., & Jankowski, N. W. (2006). Conducting online surveys. Quality and Quantity, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8
Vazquez, P., & Campopiano, G. (2023). Beyond money: wealth and wellbeing of the business family. European Journal of Family Business, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.vi.15094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.vi.15094
Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B. (2017). Collective psychological ownership and intergroup relations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706514
Wang, X., Fielding, K. S., & Dean, A. J. (2023). “Nature is mine/ours”: Measuring individual and collective psychological ownership of nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85, 101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101919
Whorf, B. L. (1997). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: A Reader, 443–463. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_35
Zellweger, T., Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness:Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2009.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2009.12.003
Descargas
Publicado
Dimensions
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Ana Lucia Caicedo-Leitón, Lucia Garcés-Galdeano, Martin Larraza-Kintana, Yeraldy Escobar-Tobar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los derechos de autoría son de dos tipos: morales y patrimoniales, los cuales EJFB reconoce y respeta. Los derechos morales son los relacionados con el reconocimiento de autoría. Son prerrogativas perpetuas, irrenunciables, intransferibles, inalienables, inembargables e imprescriptibles como consecuencia del vínculo indivisible del autor/a y su obra. Los derechos patrimoniales son aquellos que se derivan de la reproducción, distribución, adaptación o comunicación pública de la obra, entre otros. Estos derechos patrimoniales son cedidos por EJFB a la Universidad de Málaga en acceso abierto.
Los autores y autoras que publican en EJFB reconocen que la revista se publica en completo acceso abierto y que está autorizada para reproducir, distribuir, difundir o comunicar el trabajo bajo una Licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Esto significa que usted es libre de compartir y adaptar este material bajo las condiciones siguientes:
- Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, lo que implica el derecho de los autores y autoras a ser reconocidos y citados correctamente.
- No Comercial — No puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales.
- Compartir Igual — Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
Cómo citar
1.png){kind=logo}
26.png)
