Art and Nature in Physics II

Uses and scope of an analogy

Authors

  • Alberto Ross a:1:{s:5:"es_ES";s:24:"Universidad Panamericana";}

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Claridadescrf.v13i1.10247

Keywords:

Aristotle, Physics, Nature, Art, Teleology, Analogy

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to reconstruct the different uses of the analogy between phúsis and tékhne that Aristotle introduces in Physics II. I will try to show that this comparison is referred to in order to exemplify a thesis, but also for arguing or defending a specific position, i.e. it can appear as a didactic resource, but also as a premise for an argument. This is a sign of a peculiar view about the structure of the reality. For ease of presentation, firstly, I will explain the use of the analogy between phúsis and téchne in the context of the definition about what is nature. Secondly, I will present the use of this comparison in the clarification of the two senses of phúsis. Finally, I will explore the apparition of these terms in the argumentation of Physics II 8. In these passages, Aristotle defends the presence of final causes in nature

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristóteles (1982) (trad. Miguel Candel Sanmartín): Tratados de Lógica (Órganon). Madrid: Gredos.

Aristóteles (1995) (trad. Guillermo de Echandía): Física. Madrid: Gredos.

Aristóteles (1970) (trad. Valentín García Yebra): Metafísica de Aristóteles. Madrid: Gredos.

Aristóteles (1993) (trad. Marcello D. Boeri): Aristóteles Física I-II. Buenos Aires: Biblos.

Charles, D. (1995): «Teleological causation in the Physics», en L. Judson, Aristotle’s Physics: a collection of essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 101-128.

Leunissen, M. (ed.) (2015): Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Charlton, W. (1970): Aristotle’ s Physics. Books I and II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Judson, L. (1995): Aristotle’s Physics: a collection of essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ross, A. (2006): «La defensa aristotélica de las explicaciones teleológicas» en Fís. II 8 en Tópicos 30 bis, pp. 127-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i0.206

Ross, A. (2018): «Teleología y naturaleza en Aristóteles» en Síntesis. Revista de Filosofía I (2), pp. 101-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol1Iss2a244

Ross, D. (1936): Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198141099.book.1

Rossi, G. (2011): El azar según Aristóteles: estructuras de causalidad accidental en los procesos naturales y en la acción. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.

Scharle, M. (2015): «Man from man but not bed from bed: Nature, art and chance in Physics II» en M. Leunissen, Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381741.006

Seggiaro, C. [en línea]: «La relación entre phýsis y téchne en el Protréptico de Aristóteles y en Física II: sentido metodológico del uso de la analogía», en Páginas de Filosofía vol. 18, n. 21 (2017), http://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/htdoc/revele/index.php/filosofia/article/view/1868/58256[Consultado: 04/03/2021].

Waterlow, S. (1982): Nature, Change and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246534.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite

Art and Nature in Physics II: Uses and scope of an analogy. (2021). Claridades. Revista De filosofía, 13(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.24310/Claridadescrf.v13i1.10247