The silence of Herodotus and the processes of asébeia in the time of Pericles.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/BAETICA.2001.v0i23.439Abstract
The publication and finalization of the work of Herodotus, as it has been conserved, takes place during the first years of the war of Peloponeso. During this period takes place a series of asébeia processes whose ultimate motive seems to be political, and where are implied a series of personalities takes place a one thought and culture, tied somehow to Pericles and the intellectual circle, forged around him. Herodotus suspocious attitude, silencing and evidencing an excessive wisdom when speaking about religious topics and naming the Jonic thinkers, related with this Athenian intellectual circle, to the one that belongs, allows to ask the question about the existence of some kinds of relationship between this herodotean point of view and the asébeia processes, justifying in a certain way, that autocensorship related to the author.
Downloads
References
BLÁZQUEZ, J.M. y MARTÍNEZ-PINNA, J. (1999): Historia de las religiones antiguas, Madrid, 297 y ss.
CAGNAZI, S. (1975): “Tabola dei 28 logoi di Heródoto”, Hermes 103, 385-423.
CAPELLE, W. (1992): Historia de la filosofía griega, Madrid.
CIMINO, G. (1976): “El problema dei nothoi e il filopericleismo in Hdt I, 173”, ASNP VI, 9-14.
DE SANCTIS, G. (1975): Atthis, storia della republica ateniese dalle origini alla etá di Pericle, Roma 1898, 531.
DEMAND, N. (1987): “Herodotus´ encomium of Athens: science or rhetoric?”, AJPh 108, 746-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/294798
DERENNE, E. (1930): Les procés d´impieté, París.
DODDS, E.R. (1982): Los griegos y lo irracional, Madrid.
DREWS, R. (1970): “Herodotus´ other logoi”, AJPh 91, 181-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/293041
EGGERS LAN, C. et alii (1979): Los filósofos prescocráticos II, Madrid, 304.
EGGERS LAN, C. et alii (1986): Los filósofos presocráticos III, Madrid, 24.
EGGERS LAN et alii (1994): Los filósofos presocráticos II, Madrid.
EVANS, J.A.S. (1979): “Herodotus and Athens: the evidence of the encomiun”, A.C. XLVIII, 112-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/antiq.1979.1930
EVANS, J.A.S (1991): Herodotus, Explore of the Past, New Jersey. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400861859
FINLEY, M.I. (1977): “Censura nell´antichitá clásica”, Befalgor XXXII, 605-22.
FLORY, S. (1987): The archaic smile of Herodotus, Detroit.
FOWLER, L.R. (1996): “Herodotos and his contemporaries”, Journal of Hellenic Studies 116, 62-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/631956
FRITZ, K. VON (1936): “Herodotus and the growth of Greek Historiography”, TAPhA 67, 315-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/283244
GARCÍA GUAL, C. (2000): Eurípides I, Introducción, Barcelona.
GENTILI, B. y CERRI, G. (1975): Le teorie del discorso storico nel pensiero greco e la storiografia romana arcaica, Roma.
GIL, L. (1985): Censura en el mundo antiguo, Madrid, 53.
GUTHRIE, K.R.W. (1984): Los filósofos presocráticos I, Madrid, 117 y ss.
GUTHRIE, W.K.C. (1993): Historia de la filosofía griega II, Madrid.
HERINGTON, J. (1991): “The closure of Herodotus Histories”, I.C.S. XVI, 149-60.
HOW, W.W. y WELLS, J. (1964): A comentary on Herodotus, Oxford.
HUBEÑAK, F. (1997): “Pericles y la sociedad de su época”, Memorias de Historia Antigua XVII, 9-53.
IMMERWAHR, H.R. (1986): Form and Thought in Herodotus, Cleveland.
JACOBY, F. (1913): Herodotus von Halikarnassos, RE supl. II, 205-520.
KIRK, G.S. y RAVEN, J.E. (1974): Los filósofos presocráticos, Madrid.
LANG, T. (1984): Herodoteans Narrative and Discourse, Cambridge.
LATEINER, D. (1989): The historical metod of Herodotus, Toronto. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442675773
LESKY, A. (1968): Historia de la literatura griega, Madrid.
MARASCO, G. (1976): “I procesi d´empietá nella democracia ateniese”, Atene e Roma 21, 113-31.
MEDINA GONZÁLEZ, A. y LÓPEZ PÉREZ, J.A. (2000): Eurípides I, Barcelona, 174.
MOMIGLIANO, A. (1984): La historiografía griega, Barcelona.
NESTLE, W. (1975): Historia del espíritu griego desde Homero a Luciano, Barcelona.
OSTWALD, M. (1991): “Herodotus and Athens”, I.C.S. XVI, 137-48.
O´SULLIVAN, N. (1995): “Pericles and Protágoras”, Greece and Roma XLII, 15-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500025195
PLÁCIDO, D. (1973): “El pensamiento de Protágoras y la Atenas de Pericles”, HAnt. 3, 29-68.
PLÁCIDO, D. (1988): “La condena de Protágoras en la historia de Atenas”, Gerión 6, 21-37.
PLÁCIDO, D. (1997): La sociedad ateniense. La evolución social en Atenas durante la guerra del Peloponeso, Barcelona, 86.
POHLENZ, M. (1937): Herodot, der erste Geschichtschreiber des Abendlandes, Leipzig.
PUECH, H.C. (1994): Las religiones antiguas III, Madrid, 281 y ss.
RODRÍGUEZ ADRADOS, F. (1959): Líricos griegos I, 32.
RODRÍGUEZ ADRADOS, F. (1983): Historia I-II, Introducción, Madrid, 21.
ROMILLY, J. (1988): Les grandes sophistes dans l´Athénes de Pericles, París.
RUDHARDT, J. (1960): “La définition du délit d´impiété d´après la législation attique”, M.H. 17, 87-105.
SANDVOSS, E. (1968): “Asebie und Atheismus im klassischen Zeitalter der griechicschen Polis”, Saeculum IXX, 312-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7788/saeculum-1968-0122
SCHLÖGL, A. (2000): Heródoto, Madrid, 17.
SCHRADER, C. (1984): Heródoto. Historia I-II, Madrid.
STELLA, L.A. (1935): “Heródoto ed Atene I”, Atene e Roma, 272-81.
STELLA, L.A. (1936): “Heródoto ed Atene II”, Atene e Roma, 73-100.
THOMAS, R. (1992): Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620331
VANOYEKE, V. (2000): Pericles, Madrid, 30-4.
WATERS, K.H. (1990): Heródoto el historiador: sus problemas, métodos y originalidad, México.
ZÉLLER, E. y MONDOLFO, R. (1932): La filosofía dei greci nel suo sviluppo storico, Bolonia.
Downloads
Published
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate free access to its content on the principle of making research freely available to the public. All content published in Baetica. Modern and Contemporary History Studies are subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment-NoCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license, the full text of which can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that:
The authorship and the original source of its publication (magazine, publisher and URL of the work) must be cited.
They are not used for commercial purposes.
The existence and specifications of this use license are mentioned.
Copyrights are of two kinds: moral and patrimonial. Moral rights are perpetual, inalienable, non-transferable, inalienable, unattachable and imprescriptible prerogatives. In accordance with copyright legislation, BAETICA. Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea recognizes and respects the moral right of the authors, as well as the ownership of the patrimonial right, which will be transferred to the University of Malaga for its open access dissemination. Economic rights refer to the benefits obtained from the use or disclosure of works. BAETICS. Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea is published in open access and is exclusively authorized to carry out or authorize by any means the use, distribution, disclosure, reproduction, adaptation, translation or transformation of the work.
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research, and educational purposes, including self-archiving or deposit in open access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial of the University of Malaga (UmaEditorial), being necessary to cite the source in any partial or total reproduction.
How to Cite
2.png)
