The Poverty of Postmodernism: A Hegelian Critique of Postmodern Relativism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/stheg...23045Parole chiave:
RECOGNITION, Foucault, Post-truth, ReactionaryAbstract
This paper examines the divergent accounts of recognition in G. W. F. Hegel and Michel Foucault, situating their contrast at the heart of contemporary debates about justice, multiculturalism, and decolonization. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit dramatizes recognition in the Master–Slave dialectic, where reciprocal acknowledgment of self-conscious beings provides the ontological ground for freedom. By contrast, Foucault refuses any universal subject, portraying recognition as contingent upon historically situated discourses of power/knowledge. Both thinkers converge on the claim that subjectivity is relational and mediated by struggle, yet they diverge in their capacity to sustain recognition as a normative principle. Whereas Hegel grounds recognition in the universality of spirit, Foucault disperses it across fragmentary regimes of truth, risking its reduction to a shifting discursive effect. This paper argues that Hegel’s dialectical model, in which universality is realized only through the mediated interplay of particulars, offers resources for reconciling plurality with a common horizon of freedom. Foucault’s genealogical suspicion, though powerful in exposing the contingency of subject-formation, ultimately dissolves the ontological ground necessary to adjudicate misrecognition as unjust. In a post-truth era marked by epistemic relativism, political fragmentation, and resurgent authoritarianisms, the contrast between Hegelian universality and Foucauldian fragmentation underscores the enduring need for a shared ontology of recognition capable of anchoring justice, solidarity, and freedom.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Ashley, R.K., "The Poverty of Neorealism" in International Organization 1984, 38, 2, pp. 225–286.
Baillie, J.B., The Origin and Significance of Hegel’s Logic: A General Introduction to Hegel’s System. London: Macmillan 1901.
Baudrillard, J., Cool Memories 1980–1985. London: Verso 1990.
Cox, R.W., "Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory" in Millennium 1981, 10, 2, pp. 126–155.
Das, R.J., Contradictions of Capitalist Society and Culture: Dialectics of Love and Lying, vol. 253. Leiden: Brill 2023.
D’Ancona, M., Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight It. London: Ebury Press 2017.
Derrida, J., Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press 1988.
Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1975). Translation by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books 1995.
Foucault, M., "The Order of Discourse" (1970), translation by Ian McLeod, in R. Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1981, pp. 48–78.
Foucault, M., The History of Sexuality, vol. I: An Introduction. Translation by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books 1978.
Foucault, M., The Birth of the Clinic. London: Routledge 2002.
Harvey, D., “Abstract Rules of Capital Touch Ground in Housing Crisis”, Democracy at Work video, September 10, 2021, n.p.
Hegel, G.W.F., Phenomenology of Spirit (1807). Translation by A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977.
Hegel, G.W.F., Science of Logic (1812–1832). Translation by A.V. Miller. New York: Humanities Press 1969.
Hegel, G.W.F., The Science of Logic. Translation by George Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
Honneth, A., The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1996.
Ilyenkov, E.V., The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s Capital (1960). Translation by Sergei Kuzyakov. Moscow: Progress Publishers 1982.
Koffman, A., "Bruno Latour, the Post-Truth Philosopher, Mounts a Defense of Science" in The New York Times Magazine, October 25, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/magazine/bruno-latour-post-truth-philosopher-science.html
Lapid, Y., "The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era" in International Studies Quarterly 1989, 33, 3, pp. 235–254.
Latour, B., Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1987.
Latour, B., "Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern" in Critical Inquiry 2004, 30, 2, pp. 225–248.
Lyotard, J.-F., The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translation by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1984.
Marx, K., Grundrisse: Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy (1857–1858). https://www.marxists.org/subject/dialectics/marx-engels/grundisse.htm
McIntyre, L., "The Attack on Truth" in Chronicle of Higher Education 2015. https://www.math.mcgill.ca/rags/JAC/124/Attack_On_Truth-CoHE.html
Neuhouser, F., Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2009.
Ruggie, J.G., "Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations" in International Organization 1993, 47, 1, pp. 139–174.
Taylor, C., "The Politics of Recognition", in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition”. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1992, pp. 25–73.
Taylor, C., "The Politics of Recognition", in Campus Wars. London: Routledge 2021, pp. 249–263.
Thompson, E.P., The Poverty of Theory. New York: Monthly Review Press 1978.
Žižek, S., The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2009.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Dimensions
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Elliot Goodell Ugalde
Esta revista provee acceso libre inmediato a su contenido bajo el principio de hacer disponible gratuitamente la investigación al público. Todos los contenidos publicados en Studia Hegeliana. Revista de la Sociedad Española de Estudios sobre Hegel, están sujetos a la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimento-NoComercia-Compartirigual 4.0 (específicamente, CC-by-nc-sa) cuyo texto completo puede consultar en <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>. Por ello, se permite la generación de obras derivadas siempre que no se haga un uso comercial. Tampoco se puede utilizar la obra original con finalidades comerciales. La revista no se hace responsable de las opiniones vertidas por lo autores de los trabajos que en ella se publican.
Es responsabilidad de los autores/as obtener los permisos necesarios de las imágenes que están sujetas a derechos de autor.
Los autores/as cuyas contribuciones sean aceptadas para su publicación en esta revista conservarán el derecho de autor. Este es no exclusivo de utilizar sus contribuciones con fines académicos, de investigación y educativos, incluyendo el auto-archivo o depósito en repositorios de acceso abierto de cualquier tipo.
Desde el volumen 7 de 2021 la revista Studia Hegeliana ha modificado el copyright. Desde ese año, los autores son los que conservan los derechos de autor.
La edición electrónica de esta revista esta editada por la Editorial de la Universidad de Málaga (UmaEditorial), siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.

243.png)
















