Thought law, thought malice in relation to the «performance» evaluations to teachers

Abstract

There is a widespread ignorance about what does and what it should do a
university professor, lecturer or researcher. This will create dangerous myths about how teachers should be evaluated, because paying no attention to the nature of their labor, and resulting on the creation of deep injustice. It is feared that such systems to be implemented result in infinite time-consuming bureaucratic. Precious time that should be used in teaching and research. That may also pollute the environment by creating lethal enemies among teaching people, ending up in lengthy legal proceedings. This article seeks to make a diagnosis of myths of arbitrary and subjective criteria for evaluation, proposing the general basis of a system, certainly imperfect, but objective, allowing each teacher to develop his / her career, and result in cooperation, not war of all against all.