Ecological Self and Well-being
A reflection on the correlation between the sense of connection with nature and psy-chological well-being
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/nyl.20.2026.21942Keywords:
ecologial self, sense of connection with nature, psychological well-being, inclusion of nature in the self, Nature Relatedness, EcosophyAbstract
Science has amply demonstrated that contact with nature has positive effects on the health and well-being of human beings. The research we present investigated the sense of connection with nature and its relationship to psychological well-being. The sense of connection with nature is a very recent psychological construct, developed and investigated by several environmental psychologists. Nisbet, Murphy, and Zelensky (2009) refer to it as Nature Relatedness (NR). They regard it as a relatively stable personality trait and believe it is comparable to the concept of the ecological self developed by philosopher Arne Næss. Nature Relatedness consists of three sub-components: NR-perspective, NR-experience, and NR-self. NR-self is the deepest component and represents how strongly people identify with the natural environment. This component seems to fit perfectly with the concept of the ecological self. In a population of 237 teachers in training, we found a moderate positive correlation between Nature Relatedness and psychological well-being (0.203). The component most strongly correlated with psychological well-being is NR-experience (0.317), the subscale measuring behavior. This confirms the general findings of various scientific studies, which suggest that the tendency to spend time in nature increases levels of well-being.
Downloads
References
Adiwena, B.Y., & Djuwita, R. (2019): “Nature Relatedness as a Predictor of Psychological Well-Being: A Study of Indonesian Urban Society”, ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, (34/4), 175-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v34i4.2578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v34i4.2578
Aron, A., Aron, E. N, Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991): “Close relationships as including other in the self”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (60/2), 241-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
Augello, R. (2017): “Psicología ambiental y ecopsicología en edad evolutiva: aspectos cognitivos, afectivos y relacionales”, DEHESA, Repositorio institucional Universidad de Extremadura.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2019.n2.v2.1750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2019.n2.v2.1750
Barbiero, G. & Berto, R. (2016): Introduzione alla biofilia. Roma: Carocci.
Barbiero, G. (2017): Ecologia Affettiva. Milano: Mondadori.
Berto, R. (2005): “Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, (25/3), 249-259.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
Berto, R. (2014): “The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: a literature review on restorativeness”, Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), (4/4), 394–409.
DOI: 10.3390/bs4040394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040394
Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014): “The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis”, Frontiers in Psychology, (5/Article 976).
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
Clayton, S. (2003): “Environmental Identity: A Conceptual and an Operational Definition”, en S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 45–65.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3644.003.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3644.003.0005
Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985): Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. London: Peregrine Smith.
Dupuy, H. J. (1984): “The Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) index”, en Wenger N. K., Mattson M. E., Furberg C. D., Elinson J. (Eds.), Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies, New York: LeJacq Publishing, pp. 170–183.
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80232-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(84)80232-5
Dutcher, D. D., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., & Johnson, J. B. (2007): “Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values”, Environment and Behavior, (39/4), 474–493.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298794
Fromm, E. (1964): The Heart of Man. Its Genius for Good and Evil. New York: Harper & Row.
Grabowska-Chenczke, O., Wajchman-Świtalska, S., & Woźniak, M. (2022): “Psychological Well-Being and Nature Relatedness”, Forests, (13/1048).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071048
Grossi, E., Groth, N., Mosconi, P., Cerutti, R., Pace, F., Compare, A., Apolone, G. (2006): “Development and validation of the short version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB-S)”, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, (14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t61674-000
DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-4-88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-88
Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989): The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lengieza, M.L. (2024): “Eudaimonic self-expansion: The effects of eudaimonic reflections on nature connectedness”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, (94/1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102231
Martin, C., & Czellar, S. (2016): “The extended Inclusion of Nature in Self scale”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, (47), 181–194.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.006
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004): “The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, (24/4), 503–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
Meneguzzo, F. & Zabini, F. (Eds). (2020): Terapia forestale. Roma: CNR edizioni.
Merino, A., Valor, C., & Redondo, R. (2020): “Connectedness is in my character: the relationship between nature relatedness and character strengths”, Environmental Education Research, (26/12), 1707–1728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1825630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1825630
Næss, A. (1973): “The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary”, Inquiry, (16/1–4), 95–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682
Næss, A. (1987): “Self-Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World”, The Trumpeter, (4/3).
Næss, A. (1989): Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525599
Næss, A. (2015): Introduzione all’ecologia. Pisa: ETS.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009): “The Nature Relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior”, Environment and Behavior, (41/5), 715–740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011): “Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being”, Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, (12/2), 303–322.
DOI: 10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7
Perkins, H. E. (2010): “Measuring love and care for nature”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, (30/4), 455–463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004
Santos Silva, A.L., Antunes, J., Peixoto, J., Gonçalves, M., Alves, F., Silva, J., Garrido, N., & Matos, M. (2018): “Domestic Violence: The Impact of a Nature-Based Holistic Development Program on Victims’ Well-Being”, Ecopsychology, (10), 158-172.
DOI:10.1089/eco.2018.0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0019
Santos Silva, A.L., Matos, M., & Gonçalves, M. (2023): “Nature and human well-being: a systematic review of empirical evidence from nature-based interventions”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, (67).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2227761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2227761
Santos Silva, A., & Gonçalves, M. (2024): “Nature Relatedness Scale: Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version”, Environmental Education Research, (30/10), 1806–1822.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2315574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2315574
Schultz, P. W. (2001): “The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, (21/4), 327-339.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
Schultz, P. W. (2002): “Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations”, en P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 61-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4
Tam, K.P. (2013): “Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, (34), 64–78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004
Testa, S., Civilotti, C., Di Fini, G., Rossetto, C., Boncinelli, V. & Veglia, F. (2016): “Development of two equivalent short forms of the Psychological General Well-Being Index: PGWBI-A and PGWBI-B”, TPM Test Psychometric Methodology Applied Psychology, (23/2), 149–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t56108-000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM23.2.2
Tich Nhat Hanh (1988): Interbeing, The Heart of Understanding: Commentaries on the Prajnaparamita Heart Sutra. Berkeley: Parallax Press.
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991): “Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, (11/3), 201–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
Valera, L. (2015): “Il pensiero di Arne Næss”, en A. Næss, Introduzione all’ecologia. Pisa: ETS edizioni, pp. 7-39.
Valera, L. (2018): “Home, Ecological Self and Self-Realization: Understanding Asymmetrical Relationships Through Arne Næss’s Ecosophy”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (31), 661-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9715-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9715-x
Valera, L. (2019): “Depth, Ecology and the Deep Ecology Movement”, Environmental Ethics, (41/4), 293-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201941437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201941437
Valera, L. (2023): “Arne Næss, filosofo. Al di là dell’Ecologia profonda”, en F. Nasi & L. Valera, (eds), Arne Næss. Macerata: Quodibet, pp. 20-24.
Wilson, E. O. (1984): Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231
Wilson, E. O. (2002): The future of life. Boston: Little Brown book group.
Published
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nature & Freedom. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
1. Copyright and licensing information are clearly described on the journal’s web site: all content published in Naturaleza y Libertad is open acces without limit, and are subject to the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. The full text of which can be consulted at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
2. It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions for the images that are subject to copyright. The authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or deposit in open access repositories of any kind. The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial de la University of Malaga (UmaEditorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
3. This journal allows and encourages authors to publish papers on their personal websites or in institutional repositories, both before and after their publication in this journal, as long as they provide bibliographic information that accredits, if applicable, your posting on it.
4. In no case will anonymous papers be published.
How to Cite
18.png)
