Metaphysical Argumentation in Aristotle’s Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Metyper.2009.v0i2.2834Keywords:
abstraction, demonstration, efficient, cause, formal cause, essence, existenceAbstract
Sciences that abstract per modum formae o partis frequently resort to demonstration by formal causes. On the other hand, sciences that abstract per modum totius, that is, those that do not consider just the form but also the whole substance or essence including its esse, produce demonstrations based on efficient causes. These latter kinds of demonstrations abide by the existence of the effects (they are existential demonstrations), while demonstrations by formal causes resort just to definitions (they are essential demonstrations). This paper shows that Aristotle and Aquinas prefer existential demonstrations to essential demonstrations in their metaphysical reflections.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows third parties to share the work provided that its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing arrangements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. depositing it in an institutional telematic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) provided that initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work via the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematics archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work (see The Open Access Effect).
How to Cite
17.png)
