
Dreher, Rod, The Benedict Option. A Strategy for
Christians in a Post-Christian Nation, New York:
Sentinel, 2017, 262pp
The Benedict Option,
1
-
tians who feel that “Western society is post-Christian and that absent a miracle,
-

2
politics—
     
3
Following Alasdair
-
tween two traditions of thought: emotivist
liberalism and Christian virtue
    -



-





-
1

2




3

polis-

Dreher, however, never explains why these politics of resistance against totalitarian regimes are


“common sense”) it is by no means evident that that 

For a discussion of emotivist ethics see After Virtue, -








           -
     
diluting the once robust
Christian anthropology and leaving only a narcissistic and hedonistic culture
that convinces everyone that happiness is only achievable if we satisfy every

-
         
Christian schools based on a comprehensive view of human existence, the

   
     -
    


Notwithstanding the strength and vitality of Dreher’s call for a renovated

Perhaps the most worrisome of them has to do with his understanding of our



religions, demanding a sharp distinction between the temporal and the trans-
-
against
Erasmus were Christians who tried to provide fresh answers to the questions



explanation -
-

not 
In A Catholic Modernity? 
Liquid Modernity, 

modern

Fundamental
Speeches From Five Decades, 
The Theological Origins of Modernity, 

The Disenchantment of the World. A Political History of Religion, Princeton: Princeton University

A Secular Age, 

Dreher, Rod, The Benedict Option. A Strategy for Christians
in a Post-Christian Nation. New York: Sentinel, 2017, 262pp
there are mingled together both authentic developments of the gospel, of an
-



and secular 
10
-
tion, secular modernity and Christianity coexist in a complex, fertile relations-

Another problem is found in Dreher’s understanding of “faithful ortho-
dox Christians”, that is, “theological conservatives within the three main

to all 

11
While he exhorts Christians not to water down doctrinal distinctiveness and
-


it possible to create a tight relationship between the community, education,
-
her insists in giving testimony to the truth, he sees no problem with the many

in the Eucharist, or the sacrament is rather a memorial? Has the Pope, in

of faith? What about the dogma of Mary’s Immaculate Conception? Do we
     


what an exacerbated religious pluralism, which is, ironically, a product of the





that there are in gender ideology just and necessarily vindications of histori-
cally oppressed groups, and second, that there are important contradictions

-
Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor’s Marianist Award Lecture, -

10
Fundamental Speeches From Five Decades,
11
Truth and Tolerance, -




ty gives the impression that the Christian teaching on sexuality has remained



Dreher’s The Benedict Option is an ambitious project to rejuvenate Christia-
-



to function as a catch-all strategy; and it also fails to engage modernity fairly
and properly, because of a too eager Manichean view of reality that dismisses


Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla

Bibliography
Liquid Modernity, 
The Disenchantment of the World. A Political History of Religion, Prin-

 The Theological Origins of Modernity,  

Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor’s Marianist Award Lecture, New

After Virtue, 
Truth and Tolerance, 
  Fundamental Speeches From Five Decades,   

A Secular Age, 