Epistemology of mental disorders: A transversal perspective from naturalistic and constructivist metaphysics and the pragmatic approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/escpsi.18.2.2025.20821Keywords:
clinical psychology, illness, mental disorders, ontology, philoshopy of medicine, psychiatryAbstract
Can we affirm that the current nosologies for mental disorders are accurate? In this paper, I present a concise epistemological review related to mental disorders and their conceptualization from three positions within the philosophy of mind. First, I address the naturalistic approach, delving into Szasz’s eliminativist view, Boorse’s biostatistical account, and the Wakefield’s harmful dysfunction, while also highlighting main challenges to this approach. Second, I analyze the constructivist approach and the arguments provided to critique and oppose the naturalistic perspective, as well as pointing out its weaknesses. Third, I outline the pragmatic approach, whose considerations help transcend the dialectic and confrontations between naturalistic reductionism and sociocultural constructivism. Lastly, I summarize the main conclusions and directly respond to the primary question of this paper.
Downloads
References
Aftab, A. (2017). Mental disorders and naturalism. American Journal of Psychiatry Residents' Journal, 11(3), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp-rj.2016.110304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp-rj.2016.110304
Agich, G. J. (1997). Toward a pragmatic theory of disease. In James M. Humber & Robert F. Almeder (Eds.), What is disease? (pp. 219–246). Humana Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-451-1_4
American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Ash, M. G. (1980). Academic politics in the history of science: Experimental psychology in Germany, 1879–1941. Central European History, 13(3), 255–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008938900009602
Banner, N. F. (2013). Mental disorders are not brain disorders. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 19(3), 509–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12048
Benning, T. B. (2016). No such thing as mental illness? Critical reflections on the major ideas and legacy of Thomas Szasz. BJPsych Bulletin, 40(6), 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.053249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.053249
Binney, N. (2024). Reference-Class Problems Are Real: Health-Adjusted Reference Classes and Low Bone Mineral Density. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 49(2), 128–146, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhae005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhae005
Bingham, R. & Banner, N. (2014). The definition of mental disorder: evolving but dysfunctional? Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(8), 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101661
Boorse, C. (1977). Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science, 44(4), 542–573. https://doi.org/10.1086/288768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/288768
Brendel, D. H. (2003). Reductionism, eclecticism, and pragmatism in psychiatry: the dialectic of clinical explanation. The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 28(5-6), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.28.5.563.18814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.28.5.563.18814
Cooper, R. (2002). Disease. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 33(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00018-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00018-3
Doust, J., Walker, M. J., & Rogers, W. A. (2017). Current dilemmas in defining the boundaries of disease. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 42(4), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhx009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhx009
Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1126/ciencia.847460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460
Gagné-Julien, A. M. (2021). Defending Social Objectivity for “Mental Disorder”. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 28(4), 381–384. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2021.0058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2021.0058
Ghaemi, S. N. (2009). The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.063859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.063859
Graham, G. (2010). The disordered mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and mental illness. Routledge.
Hershenov, D. B. (2020). A naturalist response to Kingma’s critique of naturalist accounts of disease. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 41, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09526-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09526-9
Hofmann, B. (2002). On the triad disease, illness and sickness. The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 27(6), 651–673. https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.27.6.651.13793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.27.6.651.13793
Hollon, S. D., Stewart, M. O., & Strunk, D. (2006). Enduring effects for cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of depression and anxiety. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57(1), 285–315. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190044
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010). Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379
Kelly, B. D., Bracken, P., Cavendish, H., Crumlish, N., MacSuibhne, S., Szasz, T., & Thornton, T. (2010). The Myth of Mental Illness: 50 years after publication: What does it mean today? Irish journal of psychological medicine, 27(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0790966700000902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0790966700000902
Kendler, K. S. (2005). Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(3), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.433
Kendler, K. S. (2016). The nature of psychiatric disorders. World Psychiatry, 15(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20292
Kingma, E. (2013). Naturalist accounts of mental disorder. In Bill KWM. Fulford, Martin Davies, Richard Gipps, George Graham, John Z. Sadler, Giovanni Stanghellini, & Tim Thornton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry (pp. 363–384). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579563.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579563.013.0025
Kirmayer, L. J., & Gold, I. (2011). Re‐socializing psychiatry: Critical neuroscience and the limits of reductionism. In S. Choudhury, & J. Slaby (Eds.), Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience (pp. 305–330). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343359.ch15
Klein, D. F. (1978). A proposed definition of mental illness. In Robert L. Spitzer & Donald F. Klein (Eds.), Critical issues in psychiatric diagnosis (pp. 41–71). Raven Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1992). The trouble with the historical philosophy of science: Robert and Maurine Rothschild Distinguished Lecture. Cambridge: Department of the History of Science, Harvard University.
Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of science, 48(1), 19–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/288975
Moynihan, R., & Henry, D. (2006). The fight against disease mongering: generating knowledge for action. PLoS medicine, 3(4): e191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030191
Müller, U., Fletcher, P. C., & Steinberg, H. (2006). The origin of pharmacopsychology: Emil Kraepelin’s experiments in Leipzig, Dorpat and Heidelberg (1882–1892). Psychopharmacology, 184, 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0239-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0239-5
Nakao, M., Shirotsuki, K., & Sugaya, N. (2021). Cognitive–behavioral therapy for management of mental health and stress-related disorders: Recent advances in techniques and technologies. BioPsychoSocial medicine, 15(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-021-00219-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-021-00219-w
Nesse, R. M. (2005). Evolutionary psychology and mental health. En D. M. Buss (Ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 903–927). John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch32
Parnas, J., & Gallagher, S. (2015). Phenomenology and the interpretation of psychopathological experience. In L. J. Kirmayer, R. Lemelson, & C. A. Cummings (Eds.), Revisioning Psychiatry: Integrating Biological, Clinical and Cultural Perspectives (pp. 65–80). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139424745.006
Pérez-Álvarez, M., Sass, L. A., & García-Montes, J. M. (2008). More Aristotle, less DSM: The ontology of mental disorders in constructivist perspective. Philosophy, psychiatry, & psychology, 15(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.0.0192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.0.0192
Rashed, M. A. (2020). More things in heaven and earth: Spirit possession, mental disorder, and intentionality. Journal of Medical Humanities, 41, 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-018-9519-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-018-9519-z
Saborido, C. (2020). Filosofía de la medicina. Tecnos.
Stein, D. J., Phillips, K. A., Bolton, D., Fulford, B. KWM., Sadler, J. Z., & Kendler, K. S. (2010). What is a mental/psychiatric disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V. Psychological medicine, 40(11), 1759–1765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709992261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709992261
Szasz, T. S. (1960). The myth of mental illness. American Psychologist, 15, 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046535
Thakker, J., Ward, T., & Strongman, K. T. (1999). Mental disorder and cross-cultural psychology: A constructivist perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 19(7), 843–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00077-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00077-4
Thornton, T. (2007). Essential Philosophy of Psychiatry. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199228713.001.1
Van Riel, R. (2016). What is constructionism in psychiatry? From social causes to psychiatric classification. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7: 57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00057
Wakefield, J. C. (1992). The concept of mental disorder: on the boundary between biological facts and social values. American psychologist, 47(3): 373. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.47.3.373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.47.3.373
Wakefield, J. C. (2000). Spandrels, vestigial organs, and such: reply to Murphy & Woolfolk’s “the harmful dysfunction analysis of mental disorder”. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 7, 253–269.
Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The concept of mental disorder: diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry, 6(3), 149–156.
Zachar, P. (2014). A metaphysics of psychopathology. MIT press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027045.001.0001
Zachar, P. (2015). Psychiatric disorders: natural kinds made by the world or practical kinds made by us? World Psychiatry, 14(3), 288–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20240
Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2007). Psychiatric disorders: A conceptual taxonomy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(4), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2007.164.4.557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2007.164.4.557
Published
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jorge Romero-Castillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All contents published in Escritos de Psicología are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Escritos de Psicología recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Escritos de Psicología is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
How to Cite
10.png)
ESCRITOS DE PSICOLOGÍA-PSYCHOLOGICAL WRITINGS is funded by the 