Análisis psicosocial del populismo de extrema derecha desde la perspectiva teórica de la identidad social

Jesús Canto-Ortíz; José Luis Álvaro; Miryam Rodriguez Monter

doi:10.24310/escpsi.19.1.2026.23448

Authors

Jesús Canto-Ortíz University of Malaga
Spain
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8139-0896
José Luis Álvaro Complutense University of Madrid
Spain
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-0305
Miryam Rodriguez Monter Complutense University of Madrid
Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/escpsi.19.1.2026.23448

Keywords:

threat, authoritarianism, social identity, leadership, populism

Abstract

Social psychology, through the theoretical perspective of social identity, has developed various lines of research to analyze the rise of far-right populist parties (FRPPs). This theoretical perspective is based on the identity leadership model and situes the political actions of these parties in an intergroup context, in which processes of social influence between the leader and followers can be observed. This theory assumes that the rise in popularity of FRPPs is due to the use of narratives and messages that highlight the various types of threats to the nation (ingroup) from certain outgroups (corrupt elites, progressive groups, and minorities). The construction of social reality as fraught with economic and cultural threats would: a) justify these parties' belligerent discourse toward their political rivals, b) conceal the true economic causes of social and economic unrest, and c) propose the implementation of authoritarian methods to govern the nation. Consequently, the role of the construction of social identity content by far-right populist leaders is essential to understanding the communication strategies they use. This work presents the main contributions made from the perspective of social identity in the understanding and analysis of the increased acceptance of the postulates of the PPED.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.

Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Jossey-Bass.

Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt & Brace.

Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224

Bos, L., Schemer, C., Corbu, N., Hameleers, M., Andreadis, I., Schulz, A., Schmuck, D., Reinemann, C. & Fawzi, N. (2020). The effects of populism as a social identity frame on persuasion and mobilisation: Evidence from a 15-country experiment. European Journal of Political Research, 59(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12334

Camargo, L. (2024). Trumpismo discursivo. Origen y expansión del discurso de la ola reaccionaria global. Editorial Verbum.

Connor, P., Varney, J., Keltner, D. & Chen, S. (2021). Social class competence stereotypes are amplified by socially signaled economic inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220916640

Delle-Donne, F. (2025). Epidemia ultra. Del fascismo europeo al Silicon Valley: Anatomía de un fenómeno que está conquitando el mundo. Península.

Forgas, J. P., Crano, W. P. & Fiedler, K. (2021). The psychology of populism. The tribal challenge to liberal democracy. Routledge.

Forti, S. (2024). Democracias en extinción. El espectro de las autocracias electorales. Akal.

Frischlich, L., Hellman, J. H., Brinkschulte, F., Becker, M. & Back, M. D. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism, conspiracy mentality, and susceptibility to distorted alternative news. Social Influence, 16(1), 24-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2021.1966499

Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. Farrar & Rinehart.

Galais, C. & Pérez-Rajó, J. (2023). Populist radical right-wing parties and the assault on political correctness: The impact of Vox in Spain. International Political Science Review, 44(4), 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121231190555

Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.

Hartwich, L. & Becker, J. L. (2019). Exposure to neoliberalism increases resentment of the elite via feelings of anomie and negative psychological reactions. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12311

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

Haslam, S. A., Alvesson, M. & Reicher, S. D. (2024). Zombie leadership: Dead ideas that still walk among us. The Leadership Quarterly, 35, 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101770

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D. & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power. Psychology Press.

Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 39 (pp. 69–126). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8

Hopkins, N. & Reicher, S. D. (2017). Social identity and health at mass gatherings. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(7), 867-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2288

Inglehart, R. F. & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have nots and cultural backlash. Harvard Kennedy School Working Paper No. RWP16-026. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659

Illouz, E. (2023). La vida emocional del populismo. Cómo el miedo, el asco, el resentimiento y el amor socavan la democracia. Katz.

Jay, S., Batruch, A., Jetten, J., McGarty, C. & Muldoon, O. T. (2019). Economic inequality and the rise of far-right populism: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2409

Jetten, J. & Mols, F. (2021). Support for populist parties: Economic deprivation, cultural blacklash or status anxiety? En J. van Prooijen (Ed.), The psychology of political polarization (pp. 97-111). Routledge.

Jetten, J., Mols, F. & Postmes, T. (2015). Relative deprivation and relative wealth enhance anti-immigration sentiments: The V-curve re-examined. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0139156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139156

Jetten, J., Ryan, R. & Mols, F. (2017). Stepping in the shoes of leaders of populist right-wing parties: Promoting anti-immigrant views in times of economic prosperity. Social Psychology, 48(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000289

Jetten, J. & Peters, K. (2019). The social psychology of inequality. Springer.

Jetten, J., Wang, Z., Steffens, N. K., Mols, F., Peters, K. & Verkuyten, M. (2017). A social identity analysis of responses to economic inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.011

Kneuer, M. (2019). The tandem of populism and Euroscepticism: A comparative perspective in the light of the European crises. Contemporary Social Science, 14(1), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1426874

Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

Lammers, J. (2023). Collective nostalgia and political ideology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 52, 101607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101607

Lammers, J. & Baldwin, M. (2020). Make America gracious again: Collective nostalgia can increase and decrease support for right-wing popular rhetoric. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(5), 943-954. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2673

Mols, F. & Jetten, J. (2014). No guts, no glory: How framing the collective past paves the way for anti-immigrant sentiments. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.08.014

Mols, F. & Jetten, J. (2016). Explaining the appeal of populism right-wing parties in times of economic prosperity. Political Psychology, 37(2), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12258

Mols, F. & Jetten, J. (2017). The wealth paradox: Economic prosperity and the hardening of attitudes. Cambridge University Press.

Mols, F. & Jetten, J. (2020). Understanding support for populist radical right parties: Toward a model that captures both demand-and-supply-side factors. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 557561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.557561

Monbiot, G. & Hutchison, P. (2025). La doctrina invisible. La historia secreta del neoliberalismo (y cómo ha acabado controlando tu vida). Capitán Swing.

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.

Mudde, C. (2014). Fighting the system? Populist radical right parties and party system change. Party Political, 20(2), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519968

Mudde, C. (2017). Populism: An ideational approach. En C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 27-47). Oxford University Press.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

Reich, W. (1933). La psicología de masas del fascismo. Bruguera, 1980.

Reicher, S. D. & Haslam, S. A. (2017). The politics of hope: Donald Trump as an entrepreneur of identity. En M. Fitduff (Ed.). Why irrational politics appeal (pp. 25-40). ABC-Clio.

Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A. & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as a collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 547-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/leaqua.2005.06.007

Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A. & Rath, R. (2008). Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Compass, 2(3), 1313-1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00113.x

Reicher, S. D. & Uluȿahin, Y. (2020). Resentment and redemption: On the mobilization of dominant group victimhood. En J. R. Volhardt (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp.275-294). Oxford University Press.

Rydgren, J. (2007). The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131752

Shayo, M. (2009). A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 147-174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090194

Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative Deprivation: A Theoretical and Meta-Analytic Review: A Theoretical and Meta-Analytic Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825

Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory. En S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-46). Erlbaum.

Strobl, N. (2022). La nueva derecha. Un análisis del conservadurismo radicalizado. Katz.

Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.

Tajfel H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Cole Publications.

Turner, J. C. (1981). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 1, 93-118.

Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.244

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.

Uysal, M. S., Jurstakova, K. & Uluȿahin, Y. (2022). An integrative social identity of populism leadership. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 16(12), e12713. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12713

Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412

Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Random House.