When Governance Matters: Board Quality, Family Control, and Firm Performance in Times of Crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.16.1.2026.23065Keywords:
Family firms, Board quality, Corporate governance, COVID-19, Firm performance, Emerging marketsAbstract
This study examines whether board quality moderates the impact of an exogenous shock on the financial performance of family firms. Using a panel of 83 Mexican listed companies over the period 2014–2023, the study analyzes firm performance during the COVID-19 crisis, focusing on the role of board institutional quality measured through an index capturing board independence, non-executive representation, CEO-chair separation, and gender diversity. Employing firm fixed-effects models with robust standard errors and two alternative performance measures (ROA and ROE), the study tests whether family ownership, board quality, and their interaction shape firms’ ability to withstand the shock. The results show that, while family control per se does not generate a differential performance effect during the pandemic, leverage exerts a strong and robust negative impact. Board quality displays a positive and marginally significant association with return on equity, suggesting that governance structures may play a more relevant role in protecting shareholder returns than in improving asset efficiency during crisis periods. Overall, the findings highlight the contingent nature of the family firm advantage and underscore the importance of capital structure and board institutional quality in explaining firm performance under conditions of extreme uncertainty.
Downloads
References
Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58
Amore, M. D., Pelucco, V., & Quarato, F. (2022). Family ownership during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Banking & Finance, 135, 106385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106385
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131472
Arteaga, R., & Basco, R. (2023). Disentangling family firm heterogeneity: Evidence from a cross-country analysis. European Journal of Family Business, 13(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.13.2.2023.17638
Bettinelli, C., Sangermano, A., Bergamaschi, M., & Bennedsen, M. (2024). Family firms´ boards: A systematic review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 33(1), 926-945. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12631
Calabrò, A., Chrisman, J. J., & Kano, L. (2022). Family-owned multinational enterprises in the post-pandemic global economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 53, 920–935. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00508-8
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x
Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (2004). Board of directors in family firms: One size fits all? Family Business Review, 17(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00008.x
Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.005
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x
Kraus, S., Clauss, T., Breier, M., Gast, J., Zardini, A., & Tiberius, V. (2020). The economics of COVID-19: Initial empirical evidence on how family firms in five European countries cope with the corona crisis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 1067–1092. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2020-0214
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.
Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0319
Shen, H., Fu, M., Pan, H., Yu, Z., & Chen, Y. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on firm performance. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(10), 2213–2230. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2020.1785863
Torres-Rivera, M. P., & Pedraza-Melo, N. A. (2023). Management competencies and their relationship with organizational performance in small and medium-sized family businesses. European Journal of Family Business, 13(2), 220-233. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.13.2.2023.16616
Verbeke, A. & Kano, L. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family–based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1183-1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00545.x
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control, and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
Watkins, K., Rodríguez, L., Fernández, V., & Briano, G. C. (2024). Interlocking directorates and family firm performance: An emerging markets perspective. Journal of Family Business Management, 14(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-02-2023-0018
Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
Yu, M. (2022). CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda. European Management Review, 20(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12522
Zona, F., Zattoni, A., & Minichilli, A. (2017). Boards of directors and firm innovation: Toward a contingency perspective on board effectiveness. Academy of Management, 2010(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2010.54499471
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the author upon reasonable request.
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Karen Watkins-Fassler
Copyright generates two different rights: moral rights and patrimonial rights that EJFB recognizes and respects. Moral rights are those relating to the recognition of the authorship. They are rights of a personal nature that are perpetual, inalienable, unseizable and imprescriptible as consequence of the indivisible union of the author and his/her work. Patrimonial rights are those that can be derived from the reproduction, distribution, adaptation or communication of the work, among others.
Authors who publish in EJFB retain the copyright of their work and grant the right of its first publication to the journal in open access. EJFB is authorized to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or communicate the work under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License. This means that you are free to share and adapt this work under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to its author(s), which implie the right to be reconognized and cited correctly.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.



.png)

27.png)

